And why is it only immoral not to teach children homosexuality and transsexualism is good healthy behavior in Western Nations? In China they are still sent to Mental Institutions for treatment. And why....and why....and why......all of the other issues that only serve to destroy family and breakdown society? It's only immoral when it's done inside the borders of Western Nations? why is that?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
Well, not that this country was settled by my ancestors as you put it, but white people's ancestral lands are in europe, not north America. That's the difference between asian people born in Asia, and African people born in Africa as you put it. When the settlers got here there was already people living here. That's one of the things they hold against white american people. Other people had already been settled here for thousands of years when the whites began to come here. So when you are asking the question about asians born in asiaa, africans born in Africa you might have also said swedes born in sweden for example. The idea that white americans have a system of racism is also that America was founded on racism because white people settled where non whites had already been settled, but they acted like no one was already here.
White europeans are the ancestors you're talking about, they were from Europe which was their homeland asians from n Asia are in their home land, Africans born in Africa are in their homeland Swedes born in Sweden are in their homeland.
White people being in North America is like arabs in Europe.
Where did you get that I was speaking about only N. America?
Second sentence in title: "Why is it only immoral to be born White in a Country settled by White Ancestors?"
e.g. ^ EUROPEANS. Who doesn't know that the Whites in N. America came from Europe? And who doesn't know that natives were here before that?
And who doesn't know that EVERY COUNTRY ON EARTH that currently has a population HAD A DIFFERENT POPULATION BEFORE THE CURRENT ONE?
Every Country on Earth that currently exists has been possessed by wide varieties of ethnic and cultural populations replacing one another for 10s of thousands of years.
And every Country that currently exists, does exist by force of arms of the population that currently resides there. Without that there is no social order and organization. It isn't just N. America; it is every Country on Earth.
So why are ONLY White Westerners terrible, immoral people for existing in the identical circumstances as every other country on Earth?
That ^ is the point I am making.
Like the point I made, I don't think people are saying it's immoral for swedes to be in sweden for example. Or for europeans to be in europe.
They are certainly attempting to place a huge burden of guilt on swedes who want to protect their culture from being overrun by hordes of Islamists who share little to no cultural values with them, and openly advocate abolishing them in favor of their seventh century version of Sharia violent and oppressive civil and religious order. And set up "no go zones" where white Swedes are not allowed, inside their own countries.
And that is happening all across Europe. And here BLM and Antifa are burning down and/or looting cities in the country that has given them more gratuities and opportunity for success than any Country in history. And the whole point of critial race theory is that it is white racism that is causing it. It has nothing to do with their obligation to use the opportunities given them. If that isn't accusing the local populations of immorality, what is it?
I thought the OP was referring to critical race theory which I am not under the impression is being taught in Europe. Maybe I'm wrong about that.