If you see a plan to depopulate 90% of the Earth via the injections, you are wrong. Why do I say that?

Look at the number of adverse effects in the VAERS database. Now multiply by 10, or even 100 to estimate the actual number (majority go unreported). Now compare that larger estimated VAERS number to the number of injections given in the US. Obviously the adverse reactions are a minuscule percentage of the hundreds of MILLIONS of injections given.

Moving on, some people think that the effects of ADE will cause people that have had the injection to experience much more severe symptoms when they catch the next virus. This is an educated guess based on the results of previous clinical trials (on animals) for mRNA "vaccines".

That is a possibility, but it won't have a 100% mortality rate. The animals in those trials were not treated, and people will be able to use IVM and HCQ to fight the virus infections. Those treatments work very well, so it will not end up being the mass extinction that you are projecting.

In fact, we don't really know WHAT is going to happen during the coming cold/flu season in the fall. It is a giant experiment - clinical trials conducted on people instead of animals. Maybe it will be a big nothingburger. We have no idea.

Now the confusing part. I can see why President Trump used operation warp speed to rush the injections to market while they were still experimental... but that's over with and I DO NOT understand why he would still be endorsing the injections at this time. They are both harmful and useless, so it makes no sense.

But even worst case, they will not kill 90% of the Earth's population, so saying that they will is just ridiculous hyperbole. Not helpful.