I want to show it to a friend. Thank you!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
I think I understand. The 5% is in itself faulty. Here is how Portugal handled it and they came up with a much lower statistic of .9%
“Shocker: Lisbon court rules that only 0.9% of 'verified cases' attributed to COVID in Portugal actually died of it”https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/06/shocker_lisbon_court_rules_that_only_09_of_verified_cases_attributed_to_covid_in_portugal_actually_died_of_it.html
That's right. The numbers being used are based on unreliable data and shouldn't be used to draw any other conclusions.
While I understand your point, I believe the information is still useful. Drawing the conclusion that the data is unreliable has additional repercussions. Questioning the system at all could be the Breakthrough a lost soul needs to begin moving into the light. What could the real numbers be? Is Cdc a trustworthy source? What are the ramifications if they are not? What are the real numbers? Perhaps the conclusion is not to trust the numbers. For the brainwashed that could be a breakthrough moment we pray for.