I mean, OP's posted comment is true if nature is allowed to run its course, but you do add an important qualifier with regard to the vaccine, i.e. 'viruses become more contagious/less lethal' if nature is allowed to run its course without the introduction of an untested experimental non-sterilising vaccine.
Basically, mass vaccination while a virus is still widespread in society is idiotic (especially when the 'vaccine' is non-sterilising), because it puts increased pressure on the virus to mutate in a way which is deadly for the vaccinated. However, in a scenario without the vaccine, OP's posted comment is accurate.
When nature is allowed to run its course without man-made interference, viruses become more contagious/less deadly.
I mean, OP's posted comment is true if nature is allowed to run its course, but you do add an important qualifier with regard to the vaccine, i.e. 'viruses become more contagious/less lethal' if nature is allowed to run its course without the introduction of an untested experimental non-sterilising vaccine.
Basically, mass vaccination while a virus is still widespread in society is idiotic (especially when the 'vaccine' is non-sterilising), because it puts increased pressure on the virus to mutate in a way which is deadly for the vaccinated. However, in a scenario without the vaccine, OP's posted comment is accurate.
When nature is allowed to run its course without man-made interference, viruses become more contagious/less deadly.