Interesting discussion towards the end about 'packet captures'. Bennett said they had 112Tb of data to sift through that are packet captures. I'm not sure he is comparing apples to apples though he mentioned Lindell's packet captures.
So Maricopa provided 112Tb of information but I cannot imagine that includes the same packet captures that Lindell is talking about.
I agree these packets seems to be a different set of data packets than Lindell is going to be releasing. I have a feeling that the packets pillow man has are of the type Col Phil Waldron was presenting at the AZ legislator hearing back in Dec. showing the Dominion machines communicating with places all over the world with their back and forth data.
As far as the 118TB I am not sure what they could be since they were provided by Maricopa County. Since the machines were not suppose to be connected to the internet these can't be the same type of data. I'm no expert in what they consider packets but that is a huge amount of data compared to what Mike has. Do the machines in AZ take a digital image of every ballot? That is the only logical reason I can see for such a large amount of data or they are giving the auditors a bunch of useless info to sort through to delay the results.
Interesting discussion towards the end about 'packet captures'. Bennett said they had 112Tb of data to sift through that are packet captures. I'm not sure he is comparing apples to apples though he mentioned Lindell's packet captures.
So Maricopa provided 112Tb of information but I cannot imagine that includes the same packet captures that Lindell is talking about.
I agree these packets seems to be a different set of data packets than Lindell is going to be releasing. I have a feeling that the packets pillow man has are of the type Col Phil Waldron was presenting at the AZ legislator hearing back in Dec. showing the Dominion machines communicating with places all over the world with their back and forth data.
As far as the 118TB I am not sure what they could be since they were provided by Maricopa County. Since the machines were not suppose to be connected to the internet these can't be the same type of data. I'm no expert in what they consider packets but that is a huge amount of data compared to what Mike has. Do the machines in AZ take a digital image of every ballot? That is the only logical reason I can see for such a large amount of data or they are giving the auditors a bunch of useless info to sort through to delay the results.