It sounds that cop didn't want to be there either but is trying to follow orders... tough place to be but if police are supposed to be brave enough to kill or be killed they can surely reject an order as out of control and not do it
I also agree with your edit, but some people seem to be really pissed, even though we both tend to agree that the cops need to have balls enough to fight against their superiors.
At the moment, there is no just law here in Canada. We have out Charter of Rights, but thanks to Trudeau SR. there is a clause that makes it null and void in the first paragraph under a national emergency.
It is genuinely tricky, not because of the principle per se, but because of the actual practicalities. If all cops quit as the plebs believe should, they'd all be replaced by fanatical communist social justice commissars by next week. Then comes civil war, then comes foreign intervention.
I've thought of solutions for these practical issues. One I'm leaning towards is making it impossible for a cop to be fired for disobeying the law without it going to the courts, should they appeal. Now, whether civilian or a typical judicial affair come another can of worms, as the question of who gets to choose people for jury duty for instance becomes suspect or who presides, but I reckon much of this can be quelled if any and all cases brought to a court of law can be publicized at the request of the defendant. This goes for any affair, including civilian. Should it come down to it, if a petition large enough by the constituents of their respective jurisdiction is signed, perhaps then it should come down to vote.
Of course, there's worry here. It can go well or can go terrible, depending on how radicalized the people there are. But, if anything, it's still the peoples' choice, as it's still the people who pay for these public servants, regardless if they choose right or wrong. As for fraud, that's what audits are for.
Is it just if the people decide wrongly? I think the idea of what that exactly means has always been up to the people, either way.
It sounds that cop didn't want to be there either but is trying to follow orders... tough place to be but if police are supposed to be brave enough to kill or be killed they can surely reject an order as out of control and not do it
Fuck these cock suckers just following orders. Enemy number 2
You know what, you right. He seemed kinda sorry, and I'm not saying that just because he's Canadian.
Edit: Not condoning this sht at all. Just following orders is no excuse. They can't uphold just law if they don't have the balls to do what's right.
I also agree with your edit, but some people seem to be really pissed, even though we both tend to agree that the cops need to have balls enough to fight against their superiors.
Yeup! You pretty much said as much in your second sentence. Just because I understand how someone feels doesn't mean I've got to agree with it, lol.
At the moment, there is no just law here in Canada. We have out Charter of Rights, but thanks to Trudeau SR. there is a clause that makes it null and void in the first paragraph under a national emergency.
Guess what?
What, jr. has fake eyelashes too? I'm sure he has extras from his cosplaying days, aka every Thursday.
The guess what was a rhetorical. I was saying we are in a national emergency, so we don't have rights at the moment.
It is genuinely tricky, not because of the principle per se, but because of the actual practicalities. If all cops quit as the plebs believe should, they'd all be replaced by fanatical communist social justice commissars by next week. Then comes civil war, then comes foreign intervention.
That is how they want it to pan out.
I've thought of solutions for these practical issues. One I'm leaning towards is making it impossible for a cop to be fired for disobeying the law without it going to the courts, should they appeal. Now, whether civilian or a typical judicial affair come another can of worms, as the question of who gets to choose people for jury duty for instance becomes suspect or who presides, but I reckon much of this can be quelled if any and all cases brought to a court of law can be publicized at the request of the defendant. This goes for any affair, including civilian. Should it come down to it, if a petition large enough by the constituents of their respective jurisdiction is signed, perhaps then it should come down to vote.
Of course, there's worry here. It can go well or can go terrible, depending on how radicalized the people there are. But, if anything, it's still the peoples' choice, as it's still the people who pay for these public servants, regardless if they choose right or wrong. As for fraud, that's what audits are for.
Is it just if the people decide wrongly? I think the idea of what that exactly means has always been up to the people, either way.