I still have reservations as to how dangerous Spike Protein shedding may be, if it is actually happening at all.
There are two scenarios:
-
If Spike Protein shedding is real, and stooges close to the Cabal politicians are truly vaccinated, then the Cabal must have a preventable method they administer for themselves to avoid complications from Spike Proteins being transmitted from vaccinated peoples. This indicates a possible cure/preventive method therapy to deal with Spike Proteins for those who have been vaccinated.
-
If the above is false, and the Cabal politicians are willingly soaking in the Spike Proteins, then they either have a death wish (possible) or Spike Protein shedding is benign.
My conclusion? Don't worry about Spike Protein shedding. Do worry about those who have been vaccinated, as their concentration of the Spike Proteins is far higher than will ever rub off onto others through transmission.
My money is on Ivermectin and HCQ having been effective against the Spike Proteins all along. Either should be taken prophylactically by unvaccinated and vaccinated peoples alike to prevent all possible avenues of harm.
Thoughts?
Edit: To be clear, I'm softly working under the assumption Cabal members took saline or maybe B12 shots instead of the "vaccine."
Never mention hydroxychloroquine without also mentioning zinc as the active ingredient. This is a serious peeve of mine as people dash off 'HCQ' alone in discussions for a year now. It is a peeve because even the doctors who promote the treatment do not mention zinc along with HCQ (although if you go into their documents it is there) and that is alarming. Zelenko is notable in that he always points out that zinc is the active ingredient.
If someone is shedding spikes in numbers sufficient to affect others, what would that look like? It would look like they have a bad cold and coughing and sneezing and tossing snot out of their noses everywhere. They would feel awful. The mRNA manufacture is not sufficient to produce material of that volume.
Shedding concerns are coming from 'zero tolerance people' who are imagining that spikes are so harmful that even exposure to a few has grave effect. As if it is a virus that can take hold from a few specimens. That is simply not true.
The stories of women whose menses are affected by exposure to vaccinated people is kind of dubious, like it could only be genuine in very sensitive people and intense exposure such as to lovers.
Noted, I will not forget to include zinc as the active agent.
For anyone curious how important zinc is -- Ivermectin and HCQ are two of many catalysts that allow zinc to readily get in the cell and destroy viral RNA.
Zinc is the harpoon, HCQ and Ivermectin are harpoon guns. A harpoon gun is useless without the harpoon.
Thanks kindly, I know I come on a bit strong about it ;-) , but it has been literally a year. I've even sent emails to Dr. Risch and others suggesting that they start to work a better description of the zinc+ionophore "RNA dependent RNA polymerase" into their interviews. The best introduction is the March 6 2020 Medcram walkthrough The whole thing is worth a watch.
Part of the problem is that zinc has been so oversold by vitamin peddlers that doctors fear to mention nutrients, for fear of being lumped in with the wild claims. Yet here we have an actual drug interaction mechanism that is a broad spectrum antiviral.