I don't even know how this would work, but basically as a libertarian I started as against borders because they are government-created boundaries
Then I recognized that without borders it seemed difficult to decide who was and wasn't a citizen and that wasn't fair, and that it seemed like certain people in government wanted to bring in more people to get them to vote to destroy freedom, so actually the libertarian position would be for borders to protect freedom
However, now with covid we also see borders being used to prevent people from moving - some people have been stuck in countries they attempted to live in temporarily or were on vacation at, or haven't been able to visit countries because of border restrictions
The libertarian (ancap) position on borders is that private borders are fine (like, on land that a person owns, they can choose who can "immigrate" to it or not, or like private cities can decide who is allowed to visit)
So are any conservatives against borders or what do you think of this issue in light of recent developments?
Instead of needing to move to another country, maybe should focus on ALL nations being able to support their citizens so anyone who is moving to another part of the planet will be doing so in a positive way. Many parts of the world are like CA,NY and Chicago, their own leaders are killing their countries with corruption, idiotic policies and abuse of their citizens. I am pro border out of necessity to keep our spot on the planet stable. There is no natural reason why any other part of the world (nation/county) should be unable to thrive and be prosperous... Countries that are not doing so is because someone(own gov or outsiders) do not want them to be so.. NO natural reason why humans can do well in one part of the world and starve in another.