Has anyone tried using an RFID scanner or pet chip scanner where they’ve gotten their COVID shot?
This sounds absolutely nutty and is completely third hand info from a family member, so it could be completely bunk. That out of the way, my family member has a coworker I’ll call Pat that they trust to not make stories up. Pat took their pet in to the vet and the vet scanned their pet with a chip scanner. Pat then asked the vet to try scanning their arm. The right arm didn’t produce any results, but when Pat’s left arm was scanned, a number showed up on the scanner. Pat’s mother was with her and also got her left arm scanned and another number showed up for her. This was supposedly tried a few times with a control right arm vs the left arm that got the shot.
I can’t confirm this story personally, so this is more of a request for other people to test it and please report back. I know it seriously sounds too crazy to be true, but it would be a huge red pill if it is.
I wouldnt put it past the elitist swine.
I saw a video of this same thing. The woman being scanned appeared to work in a vet office. I think I saw it on Brighteon.
I saw a video of a woman being scanned on her unjabbed arm, which did not return a result. Then she turns to the other and scans her jabbed arm and returns a number. It is the only video I have seen (sorry I don't have the link, will post if I find it) however, I can not discount foul play as there is a tag on her shirt that is directly under the scanner. If more videos exist please share...
Reports of a mesh of graphene oxide being found to overlay cells after the vax lends credence to this. The substance is conductive, so it could easily act like an RFID antenna. At least in having a current induced into it by external electro-magnetic radiation. The current would create a magnetic field, which a scanner could detect.
The detected pattern probably wouldn't make any sense. RFID antennas implanted in goods have unique magnetic patterns that can be interpreted. They are an intimate part of the Internet of Things, which is sold as a good thing, but is really a path to greater surveillance.
Even if it’s an unintended consequence, it would be quite alarming. If they randomly produce a fixed number in each person, it would be a way to “serialize” every person that got it. Then it would be nothing to track people absolutely everywhere.
We must have a few Vets or Vet techs in the family here on GA. That'd be a great way to test the theory
If you can think of any, please tag them. Would love to get their input on this and see if they can test the theory on a few people.