I think you are right. I've heard him run that, "This is what I mean. We're having a conversation here..." gambit in a rally that wasn't going his way before. I think it was in 2020. Things certainly weren't as out of control as they are depicted here.
Some posts by www.midwesterndoctor.com I've read over the past few months mention colleagues that have patients that they think received saline jabs. I don't recall any expansion on the thought, however. Still, it's hopeful.
I personally think that Trump was able to disrupt the distribution of many harmful vials of vaccine. This thought is congruent with his constant claim of saving "millions of lives" with Operation Warp Speed, despite knowing how harmful mRNA injections are. I'm pretty sure there is a reason why he doesn't just "shut up about the vaccine" as so many in MAGA lament.
I hope it's true for the sake of my brothers and their families, as well as yours. My mother, a true Covidian, drew a poisoned jab somewhere along the chain, and was lost to turbo lung cancer not long after.
Obviously dirty and criminal tactics, but anyone who votes for Kennedy does not qualify to exercise that right. This whole op may be a bit of projection on Benson's part -- I like to think that voters on the right are smart enough to know who they are voting for before they go into the booth.
Excellent. If they don't respond they can be served with default judgments, which one obtains in an ex parte hearing (i.e., only you and the judge). Thankfully, I never had to go that far.
Just causing them worry and stress is rewarding, however. You're also making them burn through expensive legal time. I got more satisfaction from that then you can, because it was corporate money, rather than taxpayer. Still, lawyers focused on your threat are unable to raze the populace elsewhere.
I make those comments not as an attack, but in the hope that they make an impression on a soul or two. Looks like you're the lucky winner.
In Politics and the English Language, George Orwell explains how imprecise language makes critical thought impossible. Granted that incorrect usage of "data" has little potential for thought manipulation. The word data is generally interchangeable with the word information, because they are both composed of individual datum (i.e., a known fact).
Your Merriam-Webster quote reads like it was pulled from a fairly recent edition. My 1993 Webster's has: "data pl of DATUM". That's it. Definitions in newer, and on-line dictionaries are laced with subtle propaganda. I use the word "gender" as a test. If the book equates it to sex, I throw it out. Church sales are a good place to find older versions.
One can argue that the definition has been modified to reflect popular usage. But has it? Or is the reverse closer to the truth? Namely, that the definition was changed in order to nudge people towards accepting that "sex" is like "gender," that is to say, completely arbitrary. It is very useful for those who want to destroy the traditional family to have folks think that way. More obvious examples are the WHO changing the definitions of "vaccine" and "pandemic." Words matter.
Another one that gets me is, "could care less," which, if you think about it, is the reverse of what's meant to be implied. So then, if you could care less, then why don't you?
The trick was to serve the named perps with default judgments over the harms they were inflicting on me. Of course, they threw that away on their lawyers' advice, after which I sent out fee schedules charging each $10,000 per person, per day, per violation.
After that I wandered about the office ignoring all mandates, and never got bothered about the vaxx or my status. They even stopped prompting me to file an exemption.
I think the key was to make the suit painful and personal. I filed directly against the CEO on down.
I think you are right. I've heard him run that, "This is what I mean. We're having a conversation here..." gambit in a rally that wasn't going his way before. I think it was in 2020. Things certainly weren't as out of control as they are depicted here.