At 41:01 in his CPAC speech tonight, Trump starts talking about Bill Barr and questioning his lack of interest in election fraud.
At 43:06 Trump says he has a statement from US ATTORNEY in PA saying Bill Barr would not allow him to investigate fraud.
He goes on to say nobody else has seen this yet. Specifically asks Devin Nunes and Matt Gaetz if they have it yet. He directs them to talk to PA US Attorney and find out what is in letter.
Sessions actually appointed Durham, but Barr expanded his authority.
He was appointed by Barr in April of 2019. Five months after Sessions left office. Durham has been fired from his normal position after January 20th. He's now a special prosecutor only. Made so by Barr right after the election on November 3rd. Sessions was out right after the 2018 midterm. Two whole years before Durham was appointed special prosecutor.
It appears you are correct. Sessions appointed Durham as a federal attorney, but he was later appointed as SC by Barr. One source I saw even claims that Whittaker nominated Durham for SC, and then Barr finalized it. Looks like a good bit of smoke surrounding his SC appointment from what I can see.
Either way, I suspect Durham is swamp trash. I don't expect anything of great significance to come out of his SC. So in my opinion, it would seem fitting that he was appointed as SC by his fellow swamp trash, Barr.
If Durham was swamp trash, I suspect he would just fold up the entire investigation, and it would go away. If Biden is in charge, then there isn't anyone that would stop him. The Media would certainly have his back. No, just like everything else, it's being delayed so everything else can catch up. It has to be a Perfect Storm.
My theory on Durham is that he is actually a [republican allied] swamp extremist. Barr locked him in as SC so that he can continue collecting evidence.
Why did he collect all that evidence, but never use it- except for that one time when he charged an FBI peon with conspiracy, and making false statements? He later dropped the [major] conspiracy charge, and only charged him with lying, and let him off with probation. Why, oh why could that be?
I'll tell you why. That charge was a warning shot to the [democrat left] swamp. What for? Extortion. Pay up, or else get hit with the conspiracy charge. The democrat swamp paid the extortion fee to the republican swamp to drop the conspiracy charge.
Meanwhile, Durham and the republican swamp are sitting on a fucking gold mine of evidence that they would much rather use to extort the democrat swamp, rather than use that evidence for justice. We're not dealing with "the swamp." We the people are dealing with TWO swamps!"
After examining the seemingly inexplicable lack of justice being delivered during the last five years, the logical process of elimination leads me to a conclusion that corruption within the SC prosecution is the most likely reason for why we see zero justice. It's swamp vs. swamp in DC, and neither one of them want justice.