So far there is zero evidence of long term damage to the female reproductive system. That doesn't mean none will come out, but it does mean there has been none so far. All the fear porn that people have seen is not evidence of ovarian damage, but evidence of blood vessel damage somewhere in the reproductive system. Blood vessels and ovaries are not the same tissues, so its not the same thing. One could have an effect on the other, but without actual evidence, any suppositions are just that.
Anons on this board have been over the data before. It goes far beyond 'supposition', 'fear porn', and 'hypothesis'. There is actual clinical data now on a horrific miscarriage rate among vaxxed women.
Since vaxes started to become popular early this year, we'll have to wait until Sept/Oct to see how many healthy babies are born to vaxxed women. I'll venture to guess not many.
If you looked in the thread you linked you would see that the second comment from the top is mine. I show that it is not 82% death rate but 90.6% death rate in the first two trimesters according to their data.
But here's the thing. Spontaneous abortion is not generally caused by damage to the ovaries. It is caused by a shock to the developing embryo, or the mothers system, or whatever. Many things can cause it, but direct ovarian damage is not really one of the causes, unless such damage also has secondary effects (which is likely if the cause is trauma, but not minor tissue damage (AKA the vaccine), at least there is no evidence).
In addition there are thousands of data points that show endothelial damage, including specifically within the female reproductive tissue. But endothelial tissue damage IS NOT OVARIAN damage,, at least not directly. So far there has been zero data (and zero evidence) that there has been any damage to the reproductive system itself.
That doesn't mean there hasn't been. It needs to be looked at. But there is a difference between the tissues, and any biologist (including myself0 can explain it. I would be happy to elaborate on the differences if you wish.
The damage that the vaccine causes to the endothelium is so deadly because it doesn't take much to cause clotting in the capillaries, or heart attacks if there is damage in heart blood vessels, or aneurysms if there is damage to brain blood vessels, etc. That's why killing off, or causing an immune response to the blood vessels themselves (endothelium) is so harmful. It doesn't take that much damage to do a lot of harm.
But in the ovaries, killing off a few cells won't do much. It would have to be a lot of damage to the tissue itself and there is no evidence for that. Until such actual evidence exists, its fear porn and speculation.
The OP raised the issue of what to do with a prospective bride who has taken the vax. It doesn't really matter whether her future reproductive problems are caused by endothilial cell damage, ovarian damage, placental damage, poor oxygenation of the blood due to lung damage, etc. The point is simply that a young man who wants to get married and have children ought to avoid vaxxed women. His chances of fathering healthy children are much better if he marries an unvaxxed woman.
Best to move on from this young lady if you want to have kids.
That might not be particularly easy, but it's a helluva lot easier than splitting up after marrying her.
So far there is zero evidence of long term damage to the female reproductive system. That doesn't mean none will come out, but it does mean there has been none so far. All the fear porn that people have seen is not evidence of ovarian damage, but evidence of blood vessel damage somewhere in the reproductive system. Blood vessels and ovaries are not the same tissues, so its not the same thing. One could have an effect on the other, but without actual evidence, any suppositions are just that.
Anons on this board have been over the data before. It goes far beyond 'supposition', 'fear porn', and 'hypothesis'. There is actual clinical data now on a horrific miscarriage rate among vaxxed women.
Since vaxes started to become popular early this year, we'll have to wait until Sept/Oct to see how many healthy babies are born to vaxxed women. I'll venture to guess not many.
Some of the earlier threads where anons went over the data: https://greatawakening.win/p/12jJGXkWBl/-82-of-pregnant-women-who-took-m/c/
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jJGXlLCb/huge-red-flag-medical-researcher/c/
If you looked in the thread you linked you would see that the second comment from the top is mine. I show that it is not 82% death rate but 90.6% death rate in the first two trimesters according to their data.
But here's the thing. Spontaneous abortion is not generally caused by damage to the ovaries. It is caused by a shock to the developing embryo, or the mothers system, or whatever. Many things can cause it, but direct ovarian damage is not really one of the causes, unless such damage also has secondary effects (which is likely if the cause is trauma, but not minor tissue damage (AKA the vaccine), at least there is no evidence).
In addition there are thousands of data points that show endothelial damage, including specifically within the female reproductive tissue. But endothelial tissue damage IS NOT OVARIAN damage,, at least not directly. So far there has been zero data (and zero evidence) that there has been any damage to the reproductive system itself.
That doesn't mean there hasn't been. It needs to be looked at. But there is a difference between the tissues, and any biologist (including myself0 can explain it. I would be happy to elaborate on the differences if you wish.
The damage that the vaccine causes to the endothelium is so deadly because it doesn't take much to cause clotting in the capillaries, or heart attacks if there is damage in heart blood vessels, or aneurysms if there is damage to brain blood vessels, etc. That's why killing off, or causing an immune response to the blood vessels themselves (endothelium) is so harmful. It doesn't take that much damage to do a lot of harm.
But in the ovaries, killing off a few cells won't do much. It would have to be a lot of damage to the tissue itself and there is no evidence for that. Until such actual evidence exists, its fear porn and speculation.
The OP raised the issue of what to do with a prospective bride who has taken the vax. It doesn't really matter whether her future reproductive problems are caused by endothilial cell damage, ovarian damage, placental damage, poor oxygenation of the blood due to lung damage, etc. The point is simply that a young man who wants to get married and have children ought to avoid vaxxed women. His chances of fathering healthy children are much better if he marries an unvaxxed woman.