Does it really matter though? Andy Biggs was caught on camera saying that there is nothing that will be done because the Supreme Court won’t do anything about it. We can have proof all we want of Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan and others but it’s up to the SC to rule on it and he said they won’t. What gives here?
What if all those states decertify? Then there is no electoral college votes and therefore no president or president elect. The states should be able to act in some way regardless of the SCOTUS.
There is no legal mechanism to decertify electors or undo an election. If there were, people would have used this in the past if a politician failed to deliver on promises made.
Failing to deliver on promises is not a fraudulent election. There is a way for failed promises and it is called a recall. Fraud at the levels we see here makes the entire election null. The entire election can be thrown out by the Arizona courts as elections are state functions and not federal so the SCOTUS has no part to play.
They can do a recall but there is not a legal undo button after the results have been certified. The window for that was before certification. I’m not equivocating fraud with general dissatisfaction but the mechanisms are the same. If you could recall electors for any reason, then you can bet we would have seen this before in history. If this were an option you can be sure that the dems would have tried to use it for hrc
Does it really matter though? Andy Biggs was caught on camera saying that there is nothing that will be done because the Supreme Court won’t do anything about it. We can have proof all we want of Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan and others but it’s up to the SC to rule on it and he said they won’t. What gives here?
What if all those states decertify? Then there is no electoral college votes and therefore no president or president elect. The states should be able to act in some way regardless of the SCOTUS.
There is no legal mechanism to decertify electors or undo an election. If there were, people would have used this in the past if a politician failed to deliver on promises made.
Failing to deliver on promises is not a fraudulent election. There is a way for failed promises and it is called a recall. Fraud at the levels we see here makes the entire election null. The entire election can be thrown out by the Arizona courts as elections are state functions and not federal so the SCOTUS has no part to play.
They can do a recall but there is not a legal undo button after the results have been certified. The window for that was before certification. I’m not equivocating fraud with general dissatisfaction but the mechanisms are the same. If you could recall electors for any reason, then you can bet we would have seen this before in history. If this were an option you can be sure that the dems would have tried to use it for hrc