4
tstr 4 points ago +4 / -0

been finding all of you guys and following you.

1
tstr 1 point ago +1 / -0

I did? How so? illuminator

You have to admit that a hand shake account with username that is a play on 'Illuminati' is going to raise some eyebrows around these parts of the web.

7
tstr 7 points ago +7 / -0

Illuminator? nice username anyways, I guess...

Increased traffic in your area can easily be explained by people moving to that area for opportunity or because of other appealing reasons. I would never think that congestion in a locale would be caused by increased population. Increased population of that area yes but no reason to extrapolate that out world wide.

As for world population, I don't believe a single number they tell us.

1
tstr 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trying to figure out the earliest recorded history of child sacrafice to Baal/Molech. I know the bible says not to send your seed to the fires of molech so it is definitely before Christ.

Were the Phonecians known for this behavior? Anyone know?

1
tstr 1 point ago +1 / -0

The short answer is yes. The long answer is no, because they are evil. You have to remember they will break the laws to get to you and if they know you are using your abilities as a free man to break free of their system they will get really mad and come after you.

The system, those who created it, and those who run it are evil. The clerk at the court is probably just a normie but the judges and lawyers know exactly what is up.

If you challenge jurisdiction or have the judge put his oath of office in the record, these are ways of breaking out. Like I said this topic is way too big for a forum post. Dig!

http://www.annavonreitz.com/ teamlaw.net https://losthorizons.com/

1
tstr 1 point ago +2 / -1

Why does AJ come out against Q?

Because Q exposed AJ as controlled opposition.

1
tstr 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't say sovereign citizen. All people of the US Republic were sovereign. This is what made America so different. We had/have a contract with a governing body that limits what they can and cannot do. (Constitution)

A citizen is a member of a political body and is not sovereign. A citizen is the equivalent of a subject, someone who is ruled over. A sovereign is ruled over only by God.

When one agrees to be a US Citizen they lose their sovereignty. Birth certificates, SSN's, drivers licenses are all contracts that adhere you to their political system. The Constitution protected the right to travel. US Citizens have the privilege of driving if licensed.

In Common Law there are Justices, in Admiralrty there are Judges.

They effectively turned all of our rights into privileges. You as an individual can remove yourself from their political corporate system and return to common law but you have to decalre your political status and rescind all the contracts. When in court you have to declare such things and learn their deceptive language. Simple things like admitting to understanding means you now stand under their authority. Answering to your strawman name is agreeing to contract.

This is a huge subject and not one that can be explained in a forum post. You have to dig and do a lot of learning on your own but there are resources and people that can help.

5
tstr 5 points ago +5 / -0

I believe Putin recognizes who the US leadership is and who they work for and how they do not represent the people of the US.

5
tstr 5 points ago +5 / -0

On the radio they spoke about the Queen not going to Parliament because of "ongoing mobility issues". I lol'd and said "she's dead jim!"

5
tstr 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's maritime or admiralty. The common law, law of the land, was set aside and maritime brought in by the British. You can challenge jurisdiction...

6
tstr 6 points ago +6 / -0

Overturning Roe literally just kicks it back to the states. That's all it would mean. Someone was saying how that would be bad because the states could then ban abortion. I politely explained that this is the case now and states can ban abortion anytime they want. I don't get why everyone thinks that Roe is some law passed by the legislature.

1
tstr 1 point ago +1 / -0

They (FBI I guess) went to all the gas stations nearby and gathered all their security footage so none of it would leak out.

1
tstr 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Constitution doesn't grant rights. It merely limits what the government can do. In this case it cqannot do any of the things listed.

Our rights come from God.

1
tstr 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are both wrong. The Republic was destroyed in 1861 and has never been put back together. What we have now is an oligarchy operated through corporations that provide government services. Democracy or Democratic Republic would both assume we vote and the votes of the people matter.

2
tstr 2 points ago +2 / -0

The trick is how many pages of riders and pork spending will be added before it is passed.

1
tstr 1 point ago +1 / -0

My daughter is in high school and I ask her about the people in her school who still wear masks and this has pretty much been her answer unironically. There are quite a few kids out there who are still very insecure and use the mask as a security blanket.

It is sad really...

2
tstr 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hold on, I think he's made some great t-shirt material.

1
tstr 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because of what he said when he said it. I am not going to focus on one word and forget the rest of the statement. That is what you are doing.

Why do you care what I do? I already said I don't gaf. Why is this even still a thing?

1
tstr 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not at all what happened. I pointed out that Musk clearly defines his brand of socialism different from the standard model. I pointed out the context of his own statement that you were using to brand him a socialist. What he is talking about isn't socialism.

Did you read any of the replies to his tweet? Whatever. Like I said I don't care. Call him a socialist. Fuckin A

0
tstr 0 points ago +1 / -1

Don't get irritated. I am not defending Musk. I honestly don't give a crap. I just like things in context...

2
tstr 2 points ago +2 / -0

Elon sells carbon credits and stood to make millions from the Paris Agreements. So naturally he walked when that went out the door.

view more: Next ›