If we're to assume the >599k covidmortaIities is accurate - even though the pcr tests according to the inventor himself said has been used in the past to artificially inflate numbers - let's do some quick maffs. Let's also assume survival rate is only 99.8% even though the SEE DEE SEE has come out stating there were 100x LESS cases than mentioned, IIRC. That means if 599k represents 0.2% of Americans, there's 99.8% that has survived.
Crunching elementary level arithmetic and that means 599,000/0.002 is about 300 million. Roughly all Americans have had it. Meaning almost everybody has had it by now. Meaning everybody has a natural immunity to it. Is anybody else seeing this? Am I just crazy? Did I do the math wrong?
Another note on false positives vs false negatives that I've been freaking talking about since basically the beginning. Just because a PCR test's false pos chance is equal to its false neg chance doesn't mean that the number of false pos will equal the number of false neg when testing any group. The only point in time that that is accurate is if you have a group where 50% have it and 50% don't.
More quick maffs. There's a 10% false pos and false neg chance but only 10 out of 100 actually have it. A false pos entails someone who DOESN'T have it testing pos anyway whereas a false neg is the opposite. In the thing above, there are 10 people who have it, meaning 1 got a false neg. But 90 don't have it, yet 9 got a false pos regardless. That's a 9:1 pos:neg ratio, and it differs depending on actual % of people who have it.