At the peak, 1 - 3% of people owned slaves. Just think for a minute. Why would endless youth risk their life for something they didn't even do in the first place (own slaves?)
Add that to Lincoln's quote stating that the war was not about slavery and that it could be taken off the table to resolve the conflict, if an agreement could be made.
You see that the present narrative is 100% false... why accept that historical narrative is true when it's much less provable than the present, which is a lie?
"Add that to Lincoln's quote stating that the war was not about slavery and that it could be taken off the table to resolve the conflict, if an agreement could be made."
Catch 22: AH! but it was about slavery in the south and they were not going to rejoin the growing Union in which slavery was inevitably squeezed out. Note the 1850 Republican Party platform.
Read the docs of succession from those southern states. It was about slavery. Yes those elite 2-3% controlled the power, money, and narrative in their states.
At the peak, 1 - 3% of people owned slaves. Just think for a minute. Why would endless youth risk their life for something they didn't even do in the first place (own slaves?)
Add that to Lincoln's quote stating that the war was not about slavery and that it could be taken off the table to resolve the conflict, if an agreement could be made.
You see that the present narrative is 100% false... why accept that historical narrative is true when it's much less provable than the present, which is a lie?
"Add that to Lincoln's quote stating that the war was not about slavery and that it could be taken off the table to resolve the conflict, if an agreement could be made."
Catch 22: AH! but it was about slavery in the south and they were not going to rejoin the growing Union in which slavery was inevitably squeezed out. Note the 1850 Republican Party platform.
Read the docs of succession from those southern states. It was about slavery. Yes those elite 2-3% controlled the power, money, and narrative in their states.