I considered that theory some time ago and dismissed it because it's too simple and doesn't fit the facts that we now know about how the bioweapon system was designed. Also it doesn't make sense to release an airborne pathogen into the wild because then it becomes uncontrollable and may cause more destruction than intended. The best approach is to maintain control of the pathogen the entire way through. That would be done by engineering an injectable substance that causes the host to produce large quantities of the actual pathogen (spike protein) in vivo, and possibly shed those pathogenic particles to others nearby causing illness in both jabbed and unjabbed populations, which then propagates the belief that there is a pandemic.
The jab is a trojan horse for whatever nanotech they want to inject people with. I think they know a certain percentage will survive - their bodies will "accept the programming" - and they will become the first generation of transhumans. Most people won't and will die, but by the time enough people figure it out, there won't be enough people left with enough power to stop them. Most of the world now knows what this really is and the cabal is just trying to get as many people as they can before they get caught and taken down.
But surely if control is paramount, the best way would be to preemptively deliver the vaccine to only the people they want to save; otherwise how do they plan protect themselves? Then pathogen doesn't even need to be airborne, it just needs to be highly communicable so they can selectively release it within specific populations, while they hide in plain sight (trying trying to get into the mind of evil cowards here...)
But surely if control is paramount, the best way would be to preemptively deliver the vaccine to only the people they want to save
That's assuming its actually a vaccine, which we know its not. It contains no active pathogen, but contains instructions for making the pathogen and does not make one immune to the pathogen, or reduce transmission rates so by definition it is not a vaccine.
I think its likely the pharma companies released different formulas to different population centers based on who they want to get rid of and who they want to save. The ones chosen to be saved may be receiving only saline because there is no actual virus to immunize against and that's not what the injections are meant to do.
Ok not a medical expert, but my thought was, we know the vaccine doesn't make you immune to COVID19, but what if it those pathogen instructions are actually a vaccine for something we haven't even seen yet? Something that only exists in a DS lab in a bunker somewhere.
I'm just thinking what benefits them more; to wipe out the minority of people loyal to the state who willingly take the vaccine, or to wipe out those that are non compliant, along with most of the third world? If the goal is depopulation, surely it's the latter option.
Now another question; how would we hedge our bets either way? Maybe by stockpiling the vaccines until people start dropping dead in mass numbers.. then depending on who it is that's dropping dead, either take the vaccines or destroy them... sort of a Pascal's wager of a kind
The genetic instructions are for making the spike protein, which is the "payload" of the bioweapon because it attacks every cell in the body, including crossing the blood-brain barrier. We know this for a fact, so I'm not sure how that could be construed as a true vaccine for something else.
I do see what you mean and I was thinking the same thing last year but after digging into the bioweapon theory I don't think that strategy fits the currently known facts. It's very possible the DS had to go with a plan B when Trump pushed OWS to force them to roll out the shot before they were ready.
I considered that theory some time ago and dismissed it because it's too simple and doesn't fit the facts that we now know about how the bioweapon system was designed. Also it doesn't make sense to release an airborne pathogen into the wild because then it becomes uncontrollable and may cause more destruction than intended. The best approach is to maintain control of the pathogen the entire way through. That would be done by engineering an injectable substance that causes the host to produce large quantities of the actual pathogen (spike protein) in vivo, and possibly shed those pathogenic particles to others nearby causing illness in both jabbed and unjabbed populations, which then propagates the belief that there is a pandemic.
The jab is a trojan horse for whatever nanotech they want to inject people with. I think they know a certain percentage will survive - their bodies will "accept the programming" - and they will become the first generation of transhumans. Most people won't and will die, but by the time enough people figure it out, there won't be enough people left with enough power to stop them. Most of the world now knows what this really is and the cabal is just trying to get as many people as they can before they get caught and taken down.
But surely if control is paramount, the best way would be to preemptively deliver the vaccine to only the people they want to save; otherwise how do they plan protect themselves? Then pathogen doesn't even need to be airborne, it just needs to be highly communicable so they can selectively release it within specific populations, while they hide in plain sight (trying trying to get into the mind of evil cowards here...)
That's assuming its actually a vaccine, which we know its not. It contains no active pathogen, but contains instructions for making the pathogen and does not make one immune to the pathogen, or reduce transmission rates so by definition it is not a vaccine.
I think its likely the pharma companies released different formulas to different population centers based on who they want to get rid of and who they want to save. The ones chosen to be saved may be receiving only saline because there is no actual virus to immunize against and that's not what the injections are meant to do.
Ok not a medical expert, but my thought was, we know the vaccine doesn't make you immune to COVID19, but what if it those pathogen instructions are actually a vaccine for something we haven't even seen yet? Something that only exists in a DS lab in a bunker somewhere.
I'm just thinking what benefits them more; to wipe out the minority of people loyal to the state who willingly take the vaccine, or to wipe out those that are non compliant, along with most of the third world? If the goal is depopulation, surely it's the latter option.
Now another question; how would we hedge our bets either way? Maybe by stockpiling the vaccines until people start dropping dead in mass numbers.. then depending on who it is that's dropping dead, either take the vaccines or destroy them... sort of a Pascal's wager of a kind
The genetic instructions are for making the spike protein, which is the "payload" of the bioweapon because it attacks every cell in the body, including crossing the blood-brain barrier. We know this for a fact, so I'm not sure how that could be construed as a true vaccine for something else.
I do see what you mean and I was thinking the same thing last year but after digging into the bioweapon theory I don't think that strategy fits the currently known facts. It's very possible the DS had to go with a plan B when Trump pushed OWS to force them to roll out the shot before they were ready.