Poor baby. Joran Van Der Sloot was convicted in 2012 of killing a woman in Lima, Peru in 2010.
Because circumstantial evidence (which is perfectly valid evidence) AND his confessed criminal behavior point to his being NH's killer, he is widely considered to have killed her.
A minute ago he was somebody you knew nothing about and now you're literally defending a serial killer instead of agreeing to use the techniques that grade- school children know how to use in selecting sources.
Verify your sources, anon. Research carefully. Stop defending serial killers because you think it makes you (somehow?) look good. Things like this are earning you a very bad reputation on GA.
You know damn well Van Der Sloot was NOT convicted on murder charges for Natalee but you went ahead and said "of course" just to try and prove your point.
You're a snake and a shitty one, to boot.
Let's see your source for Van Der Sloot being the convicted murderer of Natalee.
Sweetie. Joran Van Der Sloot was convicted in Lima, Peru in 2012, of the 2010 murder of a woman who was NOT Natalee Holloway. He has never been convicted of Natalee's death. He is her killer, but he has not been convicted of the crime in a court in Aruba.
But you want us to trust material that is outdated and draws bad conclusions. You have been gently and patiently corrected and now it is time for you to stop being silly and defending a serial killer, and to acknowledge the importance of using better sources.
No he wasn't. He is the primary suspect. Never convicted. You're full of shit.
Poor baby. Joran Van Der Sloot was convicted in 2012 of killing a woman in Lima, Peru in 2010.
Because circumstantial evidence (which is perfectly valid evidence) AND his confessed criminal behavior point to his being NH's killer, he is widely considered to have killed her.
A minute ago he was somebody you knew nothing about and now you're literally defending a serial killer instead of agreeing to use the techniques that grade- school children know how to use in selecting sources.
Verify your sources, anon. Research carefully. Stop defending serial killers because you think it makes you (somehow?) look good. Things like this are earning you a very bad reputation on GA.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You know damn well Van Der Sloot was NOT convicted on murder charges for Natalee but you went ahead and said "of course" just to try and prove your point.
You're a snake and a shitty one, to boot.
Let's see your source for Van Der Sloot being the convicted murderer of Natalee.
Go on. Let's see, you shitty hypocrite.
Sweetie. Joran Van Der Sloot was convicted in Lima, Peru in 2012, of the 2010 murder of a woman who was NOT Natalee Holloway. He has never been convicted of Natalee's death. He is her killer, but he has not been convicted of the crime in a court in Aruba.
But you want us to trust material that is outdated and draws bad conclusions. You have been gently and patiently corrected and now it is time for you to stop being silly and defending a serial killer, and to acknowledge the importance of using better sources.
The source I used was fine.
That's rich, coming from the fella who said Van Der Sloot was convicted of Natalee's murder. Looks like YOU draw bad conclusions.
Oh and Ron Paul is a fake patriot. Take care!