The entire point of my original source is how the Zionists pretend to have running feuds (like the one you linked in your technocratic search result...you know what a technocracy is, right, smart guy?)
Hegelian Dialectic. Left and right wings of the same bird. Too bad you missed that point entirely by choosing to focus on Van Der Sloot. And then lying about him. What a strange way to go about life.
The whole point of EVERYONE else was that they aren't wasting time reading old ass outdated sources. That's why nobody cared about your point and nobody knows what your point is. Get better sources and get readers who pay attention.
Except it doesn't.
The entire point of my original source is how the Zionists pretend to have running feuds (like the one you linked in your technocratic search result...you know what a technocracy is, right, smart guy?)
Hegelian Dialectic. Left and right wings of the same bird. Too bad you missed that point entirely by choosing to focus on Van Der Sloot. And then lying about him. What a strange way to go about life.
Yes, YOUR whole point was yadda yadda yadda.
The whole point of EVERYONE else was that they aren't wasting time reading old ass outdated sources. That's why nobody cared about your point and nobody knows what your point is. Get better sources and get readers who pay attention.
There's two of you here that have a problem with the article. Everyone else got what they needed and moved on.
EVERYONE...lol, two of you Bolsheviks. You people always pretend to be the majority.
They definitely moved on! You got that part right!
And yet here you are desperately clinging to the idea that you're going to make a difference.
I wouldn't apply the term "the majority" to the amount of people who read your posts.
Did I?