In all honesty, I don't think you're a bot. Probably not even a shill. From all the other stuff I've seen around that you post/comment you're very based (or seem so). I sure as hell don't agree with you, but you absolutely could be right about Hitler if everything we were told about history is a lie (keyword still being "if" since it's also possible the truth did come out and is closer to the mainstream narrative (which I want to say can't always be wrong but they sure as hell make it seem like that sometimes)).

Now I'm not looking to go full-on "Hitler did nothing wrong" or "all jews bad" (if this is even what you think) but am curious about the alternative perspective. Any suggested reading? I, admittedly, don't know much about WW2 outside of the mainstream "Hitler bad" narrative and am kind of interested in the details of how one arrives at the opposite conclusion. You honestly seem somewhat reasonable and honest in some ways which piques my interest in what's behind it.

And I agree on sticking together (and the "Metal" guy complaining is a bit of an ass). We don't all need to have the same opinions to be part of the same fight against evil. And so long as people aren't pro-mass murder of anyone, as you pointed out you weren't in your other comment in this thread, I don't think we should be choosing our allies so harshly. We need every awake person we can get, even if we have differing views. Which hopefully if we're successful the full truth can come out and we can see where each person was right and wrong.