For context, she’s a 63 year old nurse. We got into it because she keeps pushing me to get the vaccine. I keep telling her that I am never getting it, and I have thoroughly read and studied for months in support of my decision. So she asks me to send her my sources. I spent an hour last night re-reading journal articles and mainstream news source articles that link back to university and governmental studies. Sources such as the NIH, CDC, etc. I then placed them in a specific order so that they supported each other and my brief, educated assertions typed above the links.
Her response after all of that effort, effort that would’ve gotten me an A in any college course? “These aren’t .gov or .edu sources” “I’m concerned that you only read sources you agree with”
Mother of GOD, these people are DENSE. THE GOVERNMENT AND UNIVERSITIES ARE THE PROBLEM. THEY’RE SKEWING THE DATA. THE SOURCES FORMED MY OPINION, not the other way around. There’s no convincing them otherwise. Sorry for the yelling, this is just insane. She also brushed off the lockdowns and vaccine passports like they’re nothing to worry about and people protesting are just prolonging the pandemic 🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️
As requested, my sources and synopsis in an easy to access location.
PCR test deemed ineffective for the purpose of diagnosing cases of Covid. This is a Class I recall and revocation of the Emergency Use Authorization for the PCR technology as a diagnostic tool in this instance.
Confronting the myth of unvaccinated people driving the formation of variants.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/vaccinated-covid-mutations-immune-response/
EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) for vaccines is only allowed in the absence of viable treatments. The effectiveness of Ivermectin has been suppressed, thus, the EUA for the Covid vaccines is ILLEGAL according to the government’s own standards. Why is this allowed?
https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-021-06104-9
As for chloroquine (of which the much-maligned Hydroxychloroquine is a milder derivative) it was deemed to be a potent SARS inhibitor by none other than Dr. Fauci’s NIH. Note that in the Children’s Health Defense article, those recovered from SARS (80% similar to C19) demonstrated immunity 17 years later to SARS-CoV-2. It follows that Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine are effective treatments for Covid due to its similarities to SARS. This takes us right back to the illegal EUA for the vaccines, and the countless lives lost in pursuit of it.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/
Those in the placebo group will still be granted a vaccine passport in the UK...this makes no sense.
Is the disease worse than the “jab”? The CDC is NOT gathering consistent data on hospitalizations for vaccine-related health events. Why not? What are they hiding?
https://aapsonline.org/covid-19-is-the-disease-worse-than-the-jab/
Doctors across the world have been pushing the vaccine on their pregnant patients for months and declaring it safe, yet Moderna is JUST starting trials on pregnant women?! There is NO data definitively declaring this safe for expectant mothers and their babies. THAT is the ethical violation I referenced. These are experimental vaccines and therefore informed consent is paramount so that those in receipt of them know the risks of consenting.
This Twitter thread with graphed data from government sources supporting the author’s assertions. Mostly or completely vaxxed populations are experiencing a high number of cases, while countries with a lower overall vax percentage have remained largely unchanged.
Thread by @holmenkollin on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App
All viral illnesses can have negative impacts on pregnancy. There is really nothing that can be done to prevent this beyond working to maintain a strong immune system. I could get the Covid vaccine, sure, but end up with viral meningitis or the flu—life is full of risk, illness, and danger, and Covid is just one of millions of viruses that can infect vertebrates. I am not compounding that risk by taking an experimental vaccine, with NO idea what the long term effects on my body or the bodies of my future children will be. I would much rather take my chances with what is known.
https://www.jci.org/articles/view/87490
As for your position as a BSN—I respect that deeply. However, a medical professional that is using coercive measures to get a patient to consent to an experimental substance entering their body is against everything the field should stand for.
“Be not afraid” —St. John Paul the Great
All or most of those articles must have been on pubmed. So they came from academic and scientific sources/publications (let's leave alone for now that they've been taken over by pharma and other 'interests' and have some shoddy work, such as that Surgisphere fiasco a few months ago...). Show her the institutions they came from. Should be some universities and hospitals. Have her cough up the studies she's read thoroughly....crickets maybe. Or just let it go, you tried.
Pretty sure her sources are Fraudci’s news conferences 🤮