I heard NAC has been banned but just read something that L-Cysteine, which is still around, will be converted in the body to NAC. More than 7gm/day can be harmful, if this article, is true I can see it getting banned too. Brb going to get some.
https://www.livestrong.com/article/509405-dangers-of-taking-l-cysteine/
Interesting reading. Thanks for the links. The high rate of anaphylaxis with NAC would concern me, though the others seem to have promise. There are so many different potential parts of the clotting cascade to target therapeutically, that I don't know what would be best with regards to spike-induced clotting. Hopefully they figure it out soon!
Looking into thrombolytics, guess what, it's N-acetylcysteine for a start https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/epub/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.027290
but it may not be an all around drug https://www.ashclinicalnews.org/meeting-news/n-acetylcysteine-increases-platelet-counts-in-patients-with-thrombotic-thrombocytopenia-purpura/
I heard NAC has been banned but just read something that L-Cysteine, which is still around, will be converted in the body to NAC. More than 7gm/day can be harmful, if this article, is true I can see it getting banned too. Brb going to get some. https://www.livestrong.com/article/509405-dangers-of-taking-l-cysteine/
Here's a chemical relative, another cysteine, that also affects clotting. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33050855/
Interesting reading. Thanks for the links. The high rate of anaphylaxis with NAC would concern me, though the others seem to have promise. There are so many different potential parts of the clotting cascade to target therapeutically, that I don't know what would be best with regards to spike-induced clotting. Hopefully they figure it out soon!