Frens - We have to push back on these vaccine mandates NOW. My daughter is at a top university and she may not go back. My spouse now is getting mandated to get vaxxed and submit proof or. We are both in tech and that's our livelihood. We've worked extremely hard our entire lives, have had zero handouts or help, and we're headed towards the finale of our careers. Tech companies have leverage because they provide good salaries and equity - it puts people in a huge predicament. If you don't meet their requirements and you're out, then you're essentially screwed for the remainder of your career and saving for any kind of retirement. While numerous posts here recommend - just quit, leave your job, or leave and then file a lawsuit, that's not truly a realistic and winning scenario. To expect attorneys to fight pro bono or burn through our savings while attempting to fight against large corporations who have internal and sophisticated legal armies - the end result will not be a positive outcome.
50% of our citizens are not vaccinated. Our sheer number can influence the direction this country takes. Organized and united there is the potential to change company policies and not follow the corrupt democratic government mandates. I just want to say, it's not realistic to just walk away from our jobs and expect to find other employment or to file a lawsuit. By that time, our rights have been completely taken away. It will be far too late and far too costly. If based Tech Co employees and others across our great nation make a stand together, if at least 25%+ of a company's employees say no to vaxx mandates and refuse to work under those conditions, wouldn't we expect that would force a company to change its policy? Would they really cut those employees loose?
My family, as I'm sure many of yours and especially our Military families, are under immediate threat. AT LEAST 50% of this country is against these vaccines. What can we REALISTICALLY do today and this weekend to reverse this insanity now?? What is the strategic, sophisticated, and swift approach to unite and stop this bullshit now? As a citizen, we're on the defensive - this has to change. It's the 4th down, in the 4th quarter on the 17th-yard line. It's time for an interception. Speak up! We can do this! WWG1WGA!!
The Covid-19 injection is classified as 'experimental'. Under Federal law:
21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(e)(1) - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies, there is a clear provision for the option to accept or refuse administration of the experimental product.
This means no business, including airlines can mandate vaccination for employees (new or otherwise) or require Vaccine Passports. This means college/university/CUNY and SUNI requirements for Covid vaccination is unlawful. This means no government can require Vaccine Passports due to its unlawfulness.
Government rules, guidelines, and recommendations do not exceed or meet statutory law. It is always inferior even under executive order. Only the legislature can create law. Hospitals also fall under this law. Nurses, medical doctors, and staff that have refused the Covid injection and lost their job as a result have a very valid case for lawsuits. Here is the law for Emergency Authorization Use (EAU). Remember that ALL these Covid injections are categorized as Not Approved by the FDA.
16 Am Jur 2D Section 98. “An emergency can not create power and no emergency justifies the violation of ANY OF THE PROVISIONS of the United States Constitution or States Constitutions.”
Furthermore,
16 Am Jur 2d., Sec. 97: “Then a constitution should receive a literal interpretation in favor of the Citizen, is especially true, with respect to those provisions which were designed to safeguard the liberty and security of the Citizen in regard to person and property.” Bary v. United States - 273 US 128 “Any constitutional provision intended to confer a benefit should be liberally construed in favor in the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.”
Federal law prohibits the ”denial of participation” from this business establishment as found under 28 CFR §36.202. Colleges and universities are businesses.
Under 28 CFR §36.202(c) further states that unless I have been individually assessed as a “direct threat” you may not exclude me from the same and equal services as others.
Denying service is a violation of Title II, III, and VII of the U.S. Civil Right Act of 1964.
Title III Sections 28 CFR §36.202(a)(b)(c) and 28 CFR §36.203(a)(b)(c) state that I shall not be denied the same participation and equal access as everyone else. The law prohibits Alaska Airlines or Delta Airlines from treating anyone differently or from serving anyone separately.
21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(e)(1) - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies
(A) Required conditions: (ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed— (I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product; (II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and (III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.
OSHA released its new guidance on April 20 under a “Frequently Asked Questions” section of its website having to do with COVID-19 safety compliance. NOTE the word 'guidance' is not law by any means, but rather a recommendation or a suggestion.
Q: If I require my employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reactions to the vaccine recordable?
A: If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7.
Folks, a store can not require you to wear a face mask or require you to provide proof of vaccination. This is a clear violation of the law.
For the duration of the COVID-19 public health emergency declared pursuant to section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d), this Act makes it unlawful under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act for any person, partnership, or corporation to engage in a deceptive act or practice in or affecting commerce associated with the treatment, cure, prevention, mitigation, or diagnosis of COVID–19 or a government benefit related to COVID–19. The Act provides that such a violation shall be treated as a violation of a rule defining an unfair or deceptive act or practice prescribed under Sec. 18(a)(1)(B) of the FTC Act.
Section 242 of Title 18, Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Thank you!! This is something I can work worth. Good stuff!!
Of course there is always more..... I have that too.
A fun little story here. When they had a mask mandate in my State, I never even considered complying. As a certified scuba diver, I know how valuable oxygen is for sustaining life. You see, when you are 2 atm under the water everything is not only hastened, but amplified. The human body inhales (sea level) 20.95% oxygen and includes 78% nitrogen, and 0.04% carbon dioxide. We breathe it in and when we exhale, 16% oxygen is expelled along with 78% nitrogen and 4% carbon dioxide. That means only 4.95% oxygen is utilized in our body for every breath. I hope you also noticed that none of the nitrogen is used in our body. 78% is inhaled; 78% is exhaled. Now, with carbon dioxide, 0.04% is inhaled, but 4% is exhaled. That is a hundred times more than the amount inhaled.
By this time, you're probably wondering how this relates to scuba diving. As I mentioned before, everything is hastened and amplified under water. Under water, nitrogen is 'forced' into the blood stream significantly enough below a 30 foot depth. Each atm is 30 feet. Two atm's is 60 ft, etc.
We know the deleterious effects of built up nitrogen in the blood stream under water when it isn't allowed to remove itself by depressurizing. Here's the kicker, carbon dioxide can have deleterious effect when the regulator malfunctions or the scuba tank air is tainted with 'bad' air. The effect on scuba divers can easily cause brain damage and death because everything is hastened and amplified underwater. Carbon dioxide inhalation causes hypercapnia, which damages the heart and other organs of the body. The long term effect of carbon dioxide inhalation is acidosis. It doesn't take much for this to occur. This is why OSHA always stated in their regulations concerning 'respirators' (N95) for particulates to use them for a very short time period. OSHA regulations for respirators state that when the air intake dropped below 19.5% (that's only a 1.45% drop in oxygen), the worker must be removed from the environment completely because of imminent danger. A recent study showed children wearing masks fell to this threshold within after a couple of minutes. OSHA even talks about carbon dioxide inhalation causing acidosis, which alters the cellular PH level for their proper functioning. It is well known in medicine that acidosis causes cancer.
In my State, there were three occassions, in which I was refused service for not wearing a mask. For each of these business, I replied I had a medical condition. Every governor's EO provides for a medical condition as an exemption to wearing a mask. This however, did not stop these businesses from violating my Rights. It was their mistake.
As a consequence, I immediately took names and management and corporate information. I then sent a complaint and a 25+ page Cease and Desist letter to the corporate office. I made it clear they were violating the law and depriving me of my writes according to State and Federal law. Furthermore, I provided the OSHA regulations each of these businesses were in violation of. I offered to arbitrate with their lawyer to avoid legal action and gave them ten days for their response before "we" pursued further legal action.
The businesses all 'lawyered-up' and responded within the time frame provided. Each of their responses averaged 4 to 5 pages of meandering and tortuous attorney bullshit. Not a one responded to the Statutes, Codes, and Regulations in my letter their client was in violation of, some of which were criminal violations.
The affect of my letter cost those business thousands of dollars that could have all been prevented by allowing me to make my purchase. A $12 six-pack of beer denied to me cost one business well over a thousand dollars in lawyer fees. The other two businesses were about the same. I could have done far more, especially in the arbitration scenario, but I was satisfied with this.
If more people did this, those businesses would get the message real quick. Now, what are you planning for your vaXXX mandating employer?