Because the ship was bombed. Think logically. Every room in that ship has fire ratings for the walls, doors, floors, ceilings, penetrations, etc. if. Even if the fire was on purpose, damage would’ve been minimized in any room, hull, compartment, etc. that’s without any fire suppression systems such as sprinklers or dry chemical. There is no way a person started that fire
Except that the maintenance status of that ship rendered it vulnerable, with watertight doors blocked open by welding hoses, temporary lighting and ventilation ducts, and ships in that condition often have plywood laid down on the decks to protect the decks from damage in the industrial environment, as well as the fire protection systems being disabled as mentioned.
Because the ship was bombed. Think logically. Every room in that ship has fire ratings for the walls, doors, floors, ceilings, penetrations, etc. if. Even if the fire was on purpose, damage would’ve been minimized in any room, hull, compartment, etc. that’s without any fire suppression systems such as sprinklers or dry chemical. There is no way a person started that fire
Except that the maintenance status of that ship rendered it vulnerable, with watertight doors blocked open by welding hoses, temporary lighting and ventilation ducts, and ships in that condition often have plywood laid down on the decks to protect the decks from damage in the industrial environment, as well as the fire protection systems being disabled as mentioned.
Do you buy all the COVID news too? Don't get lost in the forest
Disabling the fire protection is either retarded or sabotage. Maintenence is bound to involve volatile liquids and spark making tools.
Would love to see the safety officers investigation report