Vaccines typically require a minimum of 3 years of controlled trials before approval. These clot shots are going to be approved with virtually no trails.
Ok but hundreds of millions of people have received them at this point. That's far more than the "controlled trial" of literally any drug there's ever been.
If the risk of blood clots was significant, we'd know by now.
What would constitute an "adequate trial" of the mRNA vaccine, in your opinion?
Vaccines typically require a minimum of 3 years of controlled trials before approval. These clot shots are going to be approved with virtually no trails.
Ok but hundreds of millions of people have received them at this point. That's far more than the "controlled trial" of literally any drug there's ever been.
If the risk of blood clots was significant, we'd know by now.
We do know now.
We already know it's significant.
And that's despite of:
And that's ignoring the fact that we have no long-term data whatsoever.