Vaccines typically require a minimum of 3 years of controlled trials before approval. These clot shots are going to be approved with virtually no trails.
I like when the pro-mRNA nuts always say "This isn't new technology, it's been in development and research for over a decade" as if the length of time is somehow relevant to putting out a safe product.
I could work on a custom car for a decade and still have the engine blow up when it hits the streets in its first 100 miles.
The amount of time something's been in development and research is irrelevant if you're never able to release a product that's safe. ModeRNA has not been able to release a successful, safe and proven version of this technology EVER.
Ok but hundreds of millions of people have received them at this point. That's far more than the "controlled trial" of literally any drug there's ever been.
If the risk of blood clots was significant, we'd know by now.
Vaccine development is 10 years minimum. These aren’t even vaccines though. Experimental gene therapy.
Take a gander at the number of drugs recalled over the past 25 years. These meds made it through all the testing, yet post marketing events caused them to be pulled. Trials won’t show everything, and you can bet your ass the FDA is paid to look the other way in order for a questionable drug like Vioxx to sell enough tablets so the drug company can recoup some of the R&D costs before admitting it is not safe.
What would constitute an "adequate trial" of the mRNA vaccine, in your opinion?
Vaccines typically require a minimum of 3 years of controlled trials before approval. These clot shots are going to be approved with virtually no trails.
I like when the pro-mRNA nuts always say "This isn't new technology, it's been in development and research for over a decade" as if the length of time is somehow relevant to putting out a safe product.
I could work on a custom car for a decade and still have the engine blow up when it hits the streets in its first 100 miles.
The amount of time something's been in development and research is irrelevant if you're never able to release a product that's safe. ModeRNA has not been able to release a successful, safe and proven version of this technology EVER.
Ok but hundreds of millions of people have received them at this point. That's far more than the "controlled trial" of literally any drug there's ever been.
If the risk of blood clots was significant, we'd know by now.
We do know now.
We already know it's significant.
And that's despite of:
And that's ignoring the fact that we have no long-term data whatsoever.
Vaccine development is 10 years minimum. These aren’t even vaccines though. Experimental gene therapy.
Take a gander at the number of drugs recalled over the past 25 years. These meds made it through all the testing, yet post marketing events caused them to be pulled. Trials won’t show everything, and you can bet your ass the FDA is paid to look the other way in order for a questionable drug like Vioxx to sell enough tablets so the drug company can recoup some of the R&D costs before admitting it is not safe.
Fucking criminals.