But the fact that we have zero long-term data and that even without the corruption going on there is a non-zero chance that it could wipe out all of humanity.
It doesn't matter how infinitesimally small that probability is.
That is simply not a gamble worth taking, no matter how high the risk of a real pandemic would be.
Freedoms can be restored, at a price. Humanity can not if 100% of the population got vaccinated and it then turned out as terminal.
To be fair the main bodybdidnt support your own premise so he really didn't need any more than the title. You are the guy that made your statement so definitive. "Single most important" based on that I think you are wrong.
Yes, he did need more than the title. Neither of you have demonstrated this not to be the case.
We have managed to restore liberty and end tyranny multiple times throughout history.
I'd love to see humanity recover if 100% of the population gets vaccinated and the 0.00000....0001% chance event of humanity going entirely extinct takes place.
Please, try and demonstrate how a redeemable scenario is worse than a literal dead end.