https://web.archive.org/web/20210801144849if_/https://www.google.com/search?q=ivermectin
First article's title: "Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent Covid-19"
Top Stories:
"Huge study supporting ivermectin as Covid treatment withdrawn over ethical concerns. The preprint endorsing ivermectin as a coronavirus therapy has been widely cited, but independent researchers find glaring discrepancies in the data"
"Writers Missed Ivermectin Study Retraction"
"Ivermectin COVID-19 Scandal Shows How Vulnerable Science Is to Fraud"
All of the articles negatively depict ivermectin as a treatment. And the articles aren't even about the efficacy, they are just headlines which make people think it is bad. The articles say a scientist manipulated data in 1 of the 104 studies.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210801145655/https://c19ivermectin.com/
(Where you can actually find the studies on Ivermectin. Don't you think that should be the top search result?)
https://www.qwant.com/?client=brz-brave&q=brandon+eich+interview&t=videos&o=0%3A2gWTXWFxtjw
This was one I watched. It’s says it’s about currency tokens, and he does talk about that, but he also talks about building back the internet the way it’s supposed to be, and not what it has morphed into.
That’s what I got out of it- but it’s also been a few months and what I remember most is just he really sold me on his ideas, so don’t quote me on the my first interpretations. (I usually don’t watch videos bc I don’t have any patience for it)