Already made a post like this but it bears repeating. They say that 99.8% is the survival rate. That means >599k represents the 0.2% of people who passed. To get a number of how many people have had it by now, divide 599,999 from (0.2%/100) and the number should yield 300~ million. Otherwise known as roughly 91% of all Americans have contracted it at one point in time.
And this isn't even adjusting for the inflated numbers, as admitted by the SEE DEE SEE itself in regards to their effed up pcr tests, something the inventor himself has discussed, but that's neither here nor there.
It comes from this study I think. Admittedly, it was conducted last year but it does use a predictive model which, unless you test literally everybody, you need to do for viruses.
The scare tactic people use is taking the number of cases divided by the number of those who've passed. That's disingenuous given that not everybody who has it gets tested and not everybody who got tested has it, similar to the flu. If covid-19 is as scary as people say, we'd see it in number of Americans. An aerosol virus supposedly virulent as they claim would have made a huge impact on numbers, yet check any graphs.
But here's a thought. Take the idea of false positives and false negatives. The thought is the number of false positives would cancel the negatives out. Only if 50% of all people tested actually had it would that be true. Simple fact is, even if false positives and false negatives are at 1% each, if only 10% of all people had it and 1,000,000 were checked, that would be 100,000 people. False negatives would be 1% of 100,000 or 1,000 people. False positives, however, would be 1% of 900,000 or 9,000 people. That's people taking them multiple times aside and giving the generous estimate of 10% of all people, which only gets worse the further away from 50% it gets...
But who gets swabbed? Not healthy people, because they wouldn't need to go to the doc. This disproportionality is specific to those who need to be at the docks in the first place.