I know about the false positive rate of PCR and I don't trust it. I wrote, "PCR testing is being used as a statistical fraud."

The point is that there remains a part of us that cannot be denied on its own.

WIV cultivated a "something" in cloning that closely resembled its simulation candidate. And in a paper added last May, they claimed that that "something" satisfied Koch's principle.

I don't know that it is appropriate to apply cloning to culture a virus.

Maybe it is not a big problem because the additional paper satisfied Koch's principle, but I don't know if it is appropriate to conclude that because the cultured "something" matched the simulation candidate, it must be this one.

Or is there any flaw in the additional thesis that Koch's principle is satisfied?

There are still some points that have not been denied against the thesis that it existed. Maybe I just haven't come across it yet.

I don't care either way whether the virus exists or not. However, whichever way you lean, you need to be "trustworthy".

"I can't say for sure that there is or isn't one," is the latest "credible reason" I have.