From Brian Cates:
What would it mean if Dominion contractors wererunning a counties election for them are discovered to have had a secret elections system running where nobody could see it?
There’s what can be publicly seen, but they have a hidden system in the background runn*ng on a different os that only they can see?
That could where this is headed.
Now sit down here…I’m having a brainstorming session…what if…
Dominion was running this secret election system nationally and running all the county info to just one or two tap points? And they weren’t bothering to encrypt it because nobody was supposed to know about it?
What if Lindell’s about to drop not only accurate and validated pcaps, he’s a bout to expose a secret hidden system running in the background on all these election machines that allows the system administrator to do funky things with the vote totals?
Wouldn’t being able to boot all these election machines from the cloud conclusively prove beyond a reasonable doubt all these machines were connected to the cloud during the election?
Remember, in his lawsuit against Dominion that he filed in Minnesota, Lindell claims Dominion remotely updated all it’s election machines across the country the day before Nov. 3.
How do you remotely update election machines in all these counties if they are not connected to the cloud?
“We’ll ya see, wing nut, BEFORE the election happens, OF COURSE all of our machines are on the cloud so they can be updated and stuff. But on Election Day we take them all offline. And you can’t prove any differently, m’kay? Now go away and stop asking dumb questions or we’ll sue you.”
"Wouldn’t being able to boot all these election machines from the cloud conclusively prove beyond a reasonable doubt all these machines were connected to the cloud during the election?"
No, it would prove they had the capability to connect remotely, you need actual proof they used the function. That would be like saying you know I shot someone because I own a gun and have the capability of pulling the trigger.
But in this case someone was shot and you’re the one with the gun in your hand. A jury wouldn’t need to much time to decide if you actually pulled the trigger.
Someone was shot, but we don't know what gun it came from. It could be from a hacking the system carbine, fake ballot hand guns, illegal vote shotguns, etc. This gives one more option for how the election was stolen. It delegitimizes the certification. The fact it was connected to the internet alone shows results can't be relied upon, but we can't say this shows they used the system this way.