If they are already restricting commerce to vaxxed only (NYC, certain countries, companies, restaurants) and mandating at jobs, does that not make an argument stronger for Mark of the Beast for religious exemption? ( I know they will like laugh it off and fire us anyways).
If anything even has a whiff of Mark of the Beast I will reject as a possibility of getting it. this reeks.
Vax Passports etc appear to be the Mark or a precursor to the Mark.
It seems to me those who have had COVID should qualify for a medical exemption. They have natural immunity & we know the vaxx is of no benefit to them. In my opinion, this would be a better route to go if you've had COVID. Or even if you haven't had COVID, your doc may provide you 1.
As far as a religious exemption, it applies to those who have a "sincerely held" belief. Both Title VI (public) & Title VII (employment) make it clear that neither a business nor an employer may not challenge you as to whether the vaxx would violate your "sincerely held" belief.
However, be forewarned that under Title VII, an employer does NOT have to provide a religious exemption or accommodation should it cause an "undue hardship" for the employer. For years the EEOC has given the example of an ER who sees a significant increase in patients on Christmas Eve & Christmas requires all employees to work. Should someone who is Christian who requests those days off to observe their religious holiday, the employer can legally deny the request. The reason being if the employer Grant's the religious accommodation to 1 Christian, they would have to provide it to all Christian employees which would cause a shortage is staff (aka i.e. an undue hardship). I can foresee the EEOC using this as a reason to deny a religious accommodation & force employees to get vaxxed.
well, it is my sincerely held believe all this stuff is the Mark or leading to the Mark.
i'm not sure how it would make for undue hardship as I have an office job, and we've been teleworking for most of this time. when we get back in office more not sure if that will change.
My point being it doesn't matter if you object to the vaxx because you believe it to be the mark of the beast or because it's made from aborted fetal tissue or because it (at least temporarily) changes your DNA or all the above. So long as you believe it violates your sincerely held beliefs. Like I said, your employer is prohibited by from challenging you on it.
I brought up the "undue hardship" exemption to serve as a warning. I do not know our employer and it's not out side the realm of possibility for a company to have an HR dept that's a militant pro vax. This will be their legal arguement so we must be prepared.