Do you understand what I'm saying my "logically true"?
To be honest, no. Because when you assume something to be true, you have to then assume logical next steps, and build from there. Events don't happen in a vacuum, they have consequences, reactions.
For example, let's take your figure of 100,000s+ kids trafficked each year. That's a SIGNIFICANT figure. I believe you are getting this number from the figure that gets posted on the number of reported missing children each year, yes? Where we hit totals close to half a million.
However, these totals come from any instance of a call for a missing child. That includes a kid who ran away from home, then came back 2 hours later. If they run away next week, and the police are informed, then now the number is 2. But, it's the same kid, and both times the kid is returned to the home. So, now, we have a total of two missing children in the US, both being the same kid, both times having just hid down the street. This is a hypothetical situation but that is how the system tally works.
You can't run away with the 100,000s figure without being familiar with how the tally actually is calculated.
I'm not saying that the video is real or not real. I was simply saying that I hadn't found it on the part of the web where you would think you'd find something like this.
Just because it's not on the dark web, doesn't mean it's real.
Just because it's not on the dark web, doesn't mean it's not real.
Both are logically true at the same time while proving nothing. That is what I meant by logically true.
I think you read my statement like this.
Just because it's not on the dark web, means it's real.
Which we both agree is logically false.
Thank you for the information about how the missing kids number is tallied. I didn't know that.
What do you think about the kids that did make it to the pedo island? Do you think they are released or killed after being raped?
If you think that they are killed by Pedos/Elites/Cabal, then is it really that far of a stretch that a video, as described, could be real?
I don't think it's a far stretch, but I could be wrong.
Operating from that standpoint seems illogical. It's not logically true just because it's possible.
I think you read my statement like this.
Just because it's not on the dark web, means it's real.
This is not how I interpreted your statement, no.
While your statement that it not being on the dark web doesn't confirm it's nonexistence is correct, it's irrelevant since it brings no additional information to the table.
What do you think about the kids that did make it to the pedo island? Do you think they are released or killed after being raped?
I would need more confirmation that any kids did make it to pedo island and were raped. Currently, as with the frazzledrip video, we have rumors but no confirmations. That doesn't mean it never happened, as you pointed out, but I would need more evidence to believe it did, in order for me to provide a better response to your question.
To be honest, no. Because when you assume something to be true, you have to then assume logical next steps, and build from there. Events don't happen in a vacuum, they have consequences, reactions.
For example, let's take your figure of 100,000s+ kids trafficked each year. That's a SIGNIFICANT figure. I believe you are getting this number from the figure that gets posted on the number of reported missing children each year, yes? Where we hit totals close to half a million.
However, these totals come from any instance of a call for a missing child. That includes a kid who ran away from home, then came back 2 hours later. If they run away next week, and the police are informed, then now the number is 2. But, it's the same kid, and both times the kid is returned to the home. So, now, we have a total of two missing children in the US, both being the same kid, both times having just hid down the street. This is a hypothetical situation but that is how the system tally works.
You can't run away with the 100,000s figure without being familiar with how the tally actually is calculated.
Logic like And, Or, Xor.
I'm not saying that the video is real or not real. I was simply saying that I hadn't found it on the part of the web where you would think you'd find something like this.
Just because it's not on the dark web, doesn't mean it's real. Just because it's not on the dark web, doesn't mean it's not real.
Both are logically true at the same time while proving nothing. That is what I meant by logically true.
I think you read my statement like this.
Just because it's not on the dark web, means it's real.
Which we both agree is logically false.
Thank you for the information about how the missing kids number is tallied. I didn't know that.
What do you think about the kids that did make it to the pedo island? Do you think they are released or killed after being raped?
If you think that they are killed by Pedos/Elites/Cabal, then is it really that far of a stretch that a video, as described, could be real?
I don't think it's a far stretch, but I could be wrong.
Operating from that standpoint seems illogical. It's not logically true just because it's possible.
This is not how I interpreted your statement, no.
While your statement that it not being on the dark web doesn't confirm it's nonexistence is correct, it's irrelevant since it brings no additional information to the table.
I would need more confirmation that any kids did make it to pedo island and were raped. Currently, as with the frazzledrip video, we have rumors but no confirmations. That doesn't mean it never happened, as you pointed out, but I would need more evidence to believe it did, in order for me to provide a better response to your question.
Alright, I'm done fren. Maybe if we were in person I could say it better. Thank you for keeping it civil.
Understandable! Any time you think you want to chat again I'll be around!