They destroyed Rudy Giuliani. So sad to see this. Imagine what they can do to you...
(www.dailymail.co.uk)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
He does not look or behave 'destroyed'. He is offering to make a personalised message on video. I imagine that such a personalised message may take quite some research and, no doubt, legal knowledge. It is a good idea, and I would not knock such an enterprise. The Daily Mail are a bunch of Marxist hacks, I know, because I lived in the UK, and the rag is not much higher value than the Sun, which published soft porn on page three. The Daily Mail is read by a low IQ audience. My dad used to buy the newspapers for the family, and he refused to buy the Daily Mail, because he said they were card-carrying communsts.
Have you seen cameo? It doesn't require any "research or legal knowledge" on your part, nor on his. This is a freelance website for celebrities. You pay a celebrity for any message you want them to say to someone (within reason of course, and they can refuse). You can pay Giuliani to wish someone a happy birthday on your behalf, a happy recovery for their puppy's broken leg, or a happy bar mitzvah, or whatever.
As the article says,
"Trump Jr. is among the pricier personalities with $500 for a message. His girlfriend, former Fox host Kimberly Guilfoyle, is also on the site charging $200 per message. "
so? I don't care what is in the message. If there is a market for it then so be it. Why are people so worried by it? I said that people will try to get legal advice that way, because Rudy is a lawyer. But if they want him to say Happy Birthday, more power to them.
I think you misunderstood my comment. Here...
No they won't. This is what my comment was about: you don't use cameo to ask questions for celebrities to answer. You use it to commission a quick video message that will be delivered to someone else (like happy birthday etc).
This is not a website where you're allowed to pay Giuliani for some legal counseling or consultancy or something. There's no such thing on cameo, you can't do that.
This is why I the first thing I talked about is how there's no "research or legal knowledge" involved on anyone's part.
And yeah I don't care what's in the message either lol, and I don't care that this is news. I'm just clearing that up for you, the way cameo works.
OK
Thats the first time i have head the Mail described as a commie paper, they supported Hitler before WW2 and always have been the paper for small minded right wingers. And then there is the Express (spit)
They don't care what they print as long is its semi believable and sells copy.
Hitler was a National SOCIALIST. To me, Nazis and Commies are all the same thing, just a different flavour.