Lol
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
Lol
You have missed the point I guess. He doesn’t even need to show those first off. Also the cyber experts are in the back each day analyzing them. No one has proven them wrong through two days. Also the Tina Peters story is bigger than the packets
In that case, why hasn't there ever been a camera "in the back"? Why haven't we seen a single shot of the cyber guys with their laptops open crunching the data?
That's what I thought at first, but now I'm becoming suspicious of this whole packet thing. I hope I am wrong. I hope I experts have been working on it and will release their findings tomorrow.
I 100% agree that the Mesa County stuff is big news. I just don't think the conference overall has lived up to the massive level of hype.
The experts on site are all saying they were never provided with packet captures, and have now been told they won’t be getting them.
Source or you just making this up?
This guy is one of the top experts on packet capture analysis in the world. He wrote the software the other experts all use. The other guy mentioned in the article he links did work for Sidney Powell’s lawsuits & is part of Lindell’s team. https://twitter.com/erratarob/status/1425618284632678405?s=21