That's what I'm worried about. I really want to see the packet capture data presented today, or at least some other game-changing evidence.
The Mesa County stuff is big, but doesn't live up to the level of hype Pillow Guy promised. CodeMonkeyZ/Waldron should have analyzed the HDD image before the conference, then presented the key findings. If they didn't have time, they could release it in 2 weeks. That's better than what happened yesterday. I understand there were technical glitches or DDoS attacks, but we can't ignore the fact that they were unprepared.
Unfortunately 1/3 of the symposium has been pillow rants so far. It isn't a good look if the goal is to launch more forensic audits. I support Mike Lindell, but I have to be honest.
I was expecting much more hard evidence. I understand that Dr. Frank, Dr. Shiva, Seth Keshel and CodeMonkeyZ have given us hard data, but we still haven't seen the network data.
There's been a lot of valuable presentation happening, but lots of filler too. Like right now, Mike is just going on and on and on and on, but they also said yesterday morning their intention was to drag this thing out all 3 days. So I'm guessing Mike's off script ranting is deliberate for filling in time? I don't know. He's been ranting for the last hour, I'm shocked this man still has a voice. But looking forward to the next presentation. Hoping for something juicy today.
I have no problem with the rambling as long as he shows something juicy, preferably cybersecurity-related, because this is a 'cyber symposium' after all.
So far, only 30% of the evidence has been related to the voting machines.
That's what I'm worried about. I really want to see the packet capture data presented today, or at least some other game-changing evidence.
The Mesa County stuff is big, but doesn't live up to the level of hype Pillow Guy promised. CodeMonkeyZ/Waldron should have analyzed the HDD image before the conference, then presented the key findings. If they didn't have time, they could release it in 2 weeks. That's better than what happened yesterday. I understand there were technical glitches or DDoS attacks, but we can't ignore the fact that they were unprepared.
Unfortunately 1/3 of the symposium has been pillow rants so far. It isn't a good look if the goal is to launch more forensic audits. I support Mike Lindell, but I have to be honest.
I was expecting much more hard evidence. I understand that Dr. Frank, Dr. Shiva, Seth Keshel and CodeMonkeyZ have given us hard data, but we still haven't seen the network data.
There's been a lot of valuable presentation happening, but lots of filler too. Like right now, Mike is just going on and on and on and on, but they also said yesterday morning their intention was to drag this thing out all 3 days. So I'm guessing Mike's off script ranting is deliberate for filling in time? I don't know. He's been ranting for the last hour, I'm shocked this man still has a voice. But looking forward to the next presentation. Hoping for something juicy today.
I have no problem with the rambling as long as he shows something juicy, preferably cybersecurity-related, because this is a 'cyber symposium' after all. So far, only 30% of the evidence has been related to the voting machines.
I have no problem with the rambling as long as he shows something juicy.
The mock election video was good, but we need to see the same thing for the real 2020 election.
Is there different packets to show than the ones they showed the first day? Or than is on his first video? Absolute Proof?