I'm sure by now most of you have heard about the EO ingredient in the tests. Some people refuse to take the test because EO is a known carcinogen. The swabs are sterilized using EO but residue can be left behind in the body. We are told the amounts aren't large enough to be a concern, yet some people are getting tested weekly or more, exposing themselves to EO more and more. I don't know if all tests have EO or if it's just some of them. Those of you taking the test for work, check the ingredients of the swab to see if it contains EO.

Now let's talk about covid for a second. I have a relative working first hand with covid patients. There is no PPE gear and vaccines are not mandated at this hospital for healthcare workers and full exposure to these patients hasn't made my relative sick in any way. But I'll share the observations being made. Right now the patients are all young, working aged people. Most between 30 and 40-somethings, mothers and fathers. And many of them are dying. But it's not because they can't breathe. It's their blood. It's clotting and then bleeding out. It's responding like snake venom exposure. Some are vaccinated and some aren't. So what do they all have in common if it's not vaccine status? The testing. Some are tested repeatedly at work. Could the test be harming them? We know EO is a known carcinogen, but can it cause this type of blood problem too? Has that ever been documented? Well, here's what I found from a study done on mice that died from the same blood issues and what they found was the EO used to sterilize their bedding was behind it. Can those of you smarter than me can look into this? I'm just some dumb person trying to understand, surely if this were the case someone would have already found it by now right??

Two features were particularly noteworthy: (1) occurrence only in males of two strains and (2) consistency of the lesions both microscopically and biochemically. Although myocarditis was the most severe histological alteration, liver dysfunction with respect to clotting factor(s) was the most important clinical consequence, leading eventually to death from loss of blood. The simultaneous occurrence of the condition in two strains suggested that the disease was due to an environmental agent rather than to a mutation and that these strains differed from the others in their genetic susceptibility. A search for possible agents> implicated ethylene oxide sterilization of wood shavings used as mouse-cage bedding.

source: http://www.informatics.jax.org/greenbook/chapters/chapter18.shtml