Are you sincerely this stupid? The only "claim" I made was that the narrative in this thread is false, that Chester wasn't killed nor was he working on some child trafficking documentary. I don't have to prove anything, and his wife sure as hell doesn't. Since you believe the narrative that he was killed for his involvement in fighting child trafficking, why did you so willingly accept that as truth with NOPROOF WHATSOEVER, yet you're demanding proof of the opposite? Is it because you don't need any proof to happily accept any account of events that fits your narrative, but in order to believe any conflicting information all of a sudden now you need evidence?

I challenged you to show me a single shred of evidence that Chester DIDN'T kill himself and especially that he was working on this mythical documentary, and you can't (because there isn't any) so you did the predictable thing and dodged the question. It's transparent, and your willingness to believe anything without fact shows a lack of discernment.

You didn't need proof to believe your version, so why do you need proof to believe mine (the actual truth).