This guy is an obvious shill troll. You need only click his name and look at his history. I've run in to him a couple times now and had some laughs because I inadvertently shut him down before I knew he was a troll.
You have received the message, but you make a straw man then tell me to praise it. You misstate my claim.
As to your very specific claims, when you are serious about them you will provide the "sauce" that proves them. I cannot supply you with sauce for your own notions.
You seem to have knowledge of the inner workings of Q. We simply crave your sauces to explain how you know Ron Watkins' role in the things he does? Or in the identity of those who work with Ron? Or on the roles and jobs assigned to whom by whom? There is much to cover with your delectable sauce, but you provide none. Why do you withhold your sauces?
I need your help to explain to me why YOU, think CodeMonkeyZ is Q.
This guy is an obvious shill troll. You need only click his name and look at his history. I've run in to him a couple times now and had some laughs because I inadvertently shut him down before I knew he was a troll.
You have received the message, but you make a straw man then tell me to praise it. You misstate my claim.
As to your very specific claims, when you are serious about them you will provide the "sauce" that proves them. I cannot supply you with sauce for your own notions.
Where is your "sauce", my saucy fellow??
You seem to have knowledge of the inner workings of Q. We simply crave your sauces to explain how you know Ron Watkins' role in the things he does? Or in the identity of those who work with Ron? Or on the roles and jobs assigned to whom by whom? There is much to cover with your delectable sauce, but you provide none. Why do you withhold your sauces?