As with all people who come to the fore that present information we want to hear and believe...This following document may be worth a quick read about the patent lawyer, Dr Martins background. Maybe he is mixing truth but misdirect the audience to certain conclusions. some of this information definitely made me go hmmmm... I'm glad some people put in the leg work so we can come to our own conclusions.
The person that wrote that “article” , whoever he is, (CIA Agent ?) is full of sheiss. Dragging David Martin into the bowels of Masony because the first letter of his business name begins with an M ? WTAF ? And then it gets really cryptic. What this guy does here with David Martin could be done to ANYONE. I don’t know, maybe the guy who wrote this is SerialBrain2. Reminds me of his meanderings.
As with all people who come to the fore that present information we want to hear and believe...This following document may be worth a quick read about the patent lawyer, Dr Martins background. Maybe he is mixing truth but misdirect the audience to certain conclusions. some of this information definitely made me go hmmmm... I'm glad some people put in the leg work so we can come to our own conclusions.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tQoYi1Y6-HcZ8G1tPKcXOymVN6e7oXH91Bc0ewPljOU/edit?usp=drivesdk
The person that wrote that “article” , whoever he is, (CIA Agent ?) is full of sheiss. Dragging David Martin into the bowels of Masony because the first letter of his business name begins with an M ? WTAF ? And then it gets really cryptic. What this guy does here with David Martin could be done to ANYONE. I don’t know, maybe the guy who wrote this is SerialBrain2. Reminds me of his meanderings.