3
TheHumanPrimer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Translation: He is wasting his time because we already have the existing system rigged for Biden.

1
TheHumanPrimer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Old homes. Fixer-uppers. We haven't had a new building built here in 50 years.

1
TheHumanPrimer 1 point ago +2 / -1

Too late! Already happened. My little town added 45 in past two years. Only half speak English. Population was only 187.

2
TheHumanPrimer 2 points ago +2 / -0

As I said you are not incorrect... but your correctness is not an absolute. I'll provide two more examples.

  1. Two people describing a chair. One underneath looking up. One above looking down. Their descriptions will be completely different... yet, both are true, yet completely different truths. It would seem they are each describing different objects. However it is the same chair. Only the perspectives are different. Source: "The Assumptions"

  2. Zero. Zero represents nothing. The absence of something. Non-existent. Try as hard as you can to imagine nothing. Imagine you existing but nothing else. Hard to do right? You see, Terrance was describing universal dichotomy. If nothing existed in contrast to you then you couldn't be tall or short. Fat or skinny. Smart or dumb, Here or there? You couldn't go up or down, left or right, be right or wrong. The point being, there is no such condition where "nothing exists" thus how can you have a numeral (0) representing a state that can not exist? We are constructed in a dichotomy and by that very same dichotomy.

2
TheHumanPrimer 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are not incorrect Sir. He didn't refute that all of the base 10 math didn't work. It only falls apart when you use "0" or "1."

It is akin to the more complicated math used in quantum physics and particle physics. Each, independently prove-out their positions. Both prove true. The math proves each one. Yet, when you try to reconcile them together, the math doesn't work but instead, stand in conflict to each other -even though, they are both describing the exact same thing. So, are they both wrong or both right? As Terrance stated, that is why nobody has been able to come up with a working unified theory. Was it the state of the universe that prevents a unified theory from being discovered or something else... like the math used to construct them? Or was it (as he stated) their original zenith (assumption) from which their evaluation started from? I would argue both.

Expand your thinking and give the concept a bit more due diligence before you disregard it as junk.

1
TheHumanPrimer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Any truth is science has always been repelled with such attacks as you provided. But let us assume you are correct. If you were, then the vast field of scientific experts would easily debate Terrance and prove where he is wrong... but the haven't and will not. Why is that sir? It is easy to disregard someone for any number of reasons, (he's and actor, etc) but if he is telling the truth it would be impossible to successfully debate him... which is why nobody does.

Expand your thinking.

2
TheHumanPrimer 2 points ago +2 / -0

You missed his point. Let me explain it this way for you. Let's say you have two sticks. You can then use them in an equation. 1 stick X 1 stick, 1 stick + 1 stick, etc.

He is saying that in every such equation, your starting point was having two sticks. Now, after the equation is executed... guess what, those same two sticks still exist. One of the sticks does not magically disappear! So, in the equation of 1X1=1... he is saying we magically make one of the sticks (1s) disappear to get the answer of 1. The fact really is you will still have two sticks... so how can the answer = only 1 stick?

Does that help?

2
TheHumanPrimer 2 points ago +2 / -0

For most who hear this video... you will not fully comprehend what he is saying (which is a lot). Difficult to connect so many new dots that are disconnected from your former understanding.

Before you belittle or downplay these ideas, you should provide yourself room to absorb and really understand. If you don't comprehend it... how can you make a true assessment and judgement on the matter.

I think he is absolutely on the right path here. Granted it turns science on it's head but that has happened many times over the course of science. So why would it be so surprising to have it happen now? 3,6,9 is real. Wait until you can comprehend the paradigm shift in understanding when you apply base 12 math! We are based on base 10 now. Base 12 (ironically) has no zero.

I could go on. I only comprehended and agreed with some of what he said. But my non-agreement is based on my inability to understand those parts I could not comprehend... which doesn't make him wrong.

The only part missing in his ideas would be the inter-dimensional parts of our universe which exist and interact with our 3D construct... which is what he is describing.

Yea folks, he is definitely on to something here. This is NOT controlled opposition nor propaganda. Our entire construct of our world will change when these concepts are understood and go mainstream.

2
TheHumanPrimer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Quote: "It's not that I have anything to hide Officer, I just don't have anything I want to share... so please fuck off!"

1
TheHumanPrimer 1 point ago +1 / -0

One thing many of us have learned is that whatever we observe, read or exposed to is always (and I mean always) nestled within a larger nest, within another larger nest, within a larger nest of "onion peels"!

Then add in the constellation of "nests" these events are contained within from "off-planet", "Intergalatic", interdimensional and matrixes. Then there are the spiritual dimensions driven by religions, guides, prophets, channellers and the like.

The above average human intelligence really doesn't have the capacity to digest, assimilate, store and discern such a complex amount of information... completely overwhelming. Then consider the vast majority of human beings are much more simple in their thinking and capacity.

We have a real mess here!

This is the reason I wrote "The Human Primer" because your physical body doesn't have the capacity to lie nor decieve... and it will tell (and show) you the reactions you have to all stimuli. In the end, that understanding (how you are human) provides the lens to discern and navigate in peace, without fear or anger and stabalize your own homeostasis. In other words, how to survive it all and remain sane. I think it is time everyone had a large dose of understanding for how we are each human.

24
TheHumanPrimer 24 points ago +24 / -0

My family was a victim of this decades ago. Forced to sell off 6000 acres of a 10,000 acre plantation. Broke us... almost. Easy resolves were available... none considered. Dad ran for the Senate and BOOM...lost our land. He was a full-bird Airforce Colonel and Patriot. Too honest of public office.

6
TheHumanPrimer 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not just trees... vines are literally taking over everything!!!!

view more: Next ›