The voice that cries in the wilderness, who shall hear it? I have thought about this long before, and still do. There are some mental gymnastics that people pull here to arrive to a conclusion that fits a convenient narrative. Speaking from the side of freedom, there are very few options that make sense. Some more nefarious than others;

1. He is aware of the vaccine problems, biggest problem, the vaccine doesn't work, is not as deadly as we think, promotes it because he know its useless and wont change a thing. The whole vaccine is deadly its a black hat psyop trying to make us turn against trump. For dems, this is a lose-lose that may be worth the risk.

2. Trump is not who he says he is, and he is benefitting from the jab somehow.

3. He appears to side with dems somhow on this because the majority perception hasn't shifted enough to come out against it. Helps him get momentum. Adds plausible deniability (act according to best available data shown in mainstream) blame the black hats when shtf.

4. He has been bamboozled and he doesn't know what he is saying and white hats are letting him run with it for benefit of optics and plausible deniability.