So normally Trump seems very content to stand back and give the bad guys plenty of rope to hang themselves with, but this guy was reassigned. After being fired/reassigned, he filed a whistleblower complaint:
https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/bright-whistleblower.pdf
Recently he received a settlement:
So he seemed very particular about blocking HCQ. I'm thinking there must have been something specific he wanted to block that was too critical to just let go. Or perhaps his firing was just a message, a way to draw attention to HCQ? Maybe a way to draw attention to Bright and something in his history?
Any Bright theorists have some fun facts to share?
"Specifically, as detailed in the attached emails and other documentary evidence , Dr. Bright opposed the broad use of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as lacking scientific merit, even though the Administration promoted it as a panacea and demanded that New York and New Jersey be “ flooded ” with these drugs, which were imported from factories in Pakistan India that had not been inspected by the FDA."
I'm just listing the medications and contracts Bright seemed to clash on. Not sure he's even necessarily a bad entity. Just think some of these might be relevant:
Opposed:
AEOL 10150, contract to Aeolus Pharmaceuticals, Kushner connected, aims to reduce radiation-induced lung injury.
Oseltamivir, a neuraminidase inhibitor, from Alvogen
A contract for radiation exposure to go solely to Partner Therapeutics rather than a mix of them and Amgen.
EIDD- 2801/Molnupiravir -- persons are being recruited for a trial on this w/respect to COVID, which is pretty interesting. Bright was concerned "similar drugs produced fetal abnormalities". Drug is made in China.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04405739
The term "wildcard" keeps coming up. 'Mr. Clericiwarned that “McManus is a wildcard, andhe is the kind of person who would write stories about you for the newspapers.”'
Supported: