I've seen a lot of people talk about this on here lately. I've only been on here since a little after the election, so I'm still not 100% up to speed on literally everything Q related. So I'd appreciate it if someone could explain this for me. A video or something would work and be just as appreciated.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
It started as an experiment into some odd quantum mechanical phenomena.
If you do not have at least a a strong layman's grasp of QM, there are dozens of videos on the topic on YouTube and elsewhere that can help get you up to speed. You should already understand calculus and physics before diving into QM. I highly recommend the Feynman lectures to start. As Feynman says, which remains true today, (paraphrased) no one really understands QM.
The experimenters found that certain people could basically use the experimental apparatus as a sort of cosmic ouija board. This is where "gateway", another project, got tied in.
So, they honed the apparatus, the users got sort of tuned in, then they started asking questions and getting answers. Astoundingly, many of the answers were correct. At some point, they start asking forward-looking questions, whose answers would describe the future. They got increasingly better at this, deriving actionable intelligence that essentially enabled them to force future scenarios of their choosing, within certain limits.
The first "problem" they encountered, was that they tried to push the limits too far. This caused the quality/scope of good answers to shrink tremendously. That freaked out all involved.
The second "problem" they encountered, evident after the answer space shrank, was that all answers converged on a sort of singularity in or around the year 2012. They could find no path of action to avoid this singularity, and no cohesive answers were forthcoming beyond the singularity. To say the first problem caused a freak out is a profound understatement, but the reaction to this second problem was far and away worse.
The third "problem", which only a few people knew and which caused the project to be terminated, was the seeming explanation to the first two problems - their "looking glass" was not the only one.
The first two problems above have been corroborated to varying extents. The last problem is, technically, speculation, but can be derived from the circumstances that must have existed to cause the first two problems.