The VP would have to be confirmed by a majority of both houses. If the stupid Republicans would hold firm it could be put off indefinitely. They won't but it would be an interesting.
She had Satan eyes on TV one night... she was initiated into the Cabal a short while ago.. they take the parasite in the eye and then go on a wild high for a bit. I firmly believe she will be a patsy for their wrong doings.
The Vice President is the tiebreaker. If Kamala Harris becomes POTUS, she would select a new VP, who would probably be a Democrat, or at the very least, vote Democrat in tiebreakers. So no, not unless Harris decided to select a brand-loyalty Republican as her VP for some reason.
As long as the individual is Constitutionally qualified to be President, yes. Then a majority vote by both the House and the Senate.
It's laid out clearly by the 25th Amendment.
Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.
Read the article, and am not really sure how they seem so certain that Democrats are worried about a 50/50 tie failing in the VP nomination under Kamala Harris. Continuity of government isn't something that the legislature likes to fuck around with, and nominations usually don't get that much fight, even if the nomination hearings are loud and obnoxious.
Plus, Nancy Pelosi would still be the next in line if Harris were to stop being POTUS anyway.
Not sure that basing a theory on Mitch McConnell being able to indefinitely hold back the entire Republican party indefinitely from clearing a VP nomination holds much water.
Isn't this all just a shadow show at this point?
The VP would have to be confirmed by a majority of both houses. If the stupid Republicans would hold firm it could be put off indefinitely. They won't but it would be an interesting.
Hahaha. Republicans playing hard ball. Good one. I needed that.
She would appoint the new VP, who would then preside over the senate.
She had Satan eyes on TV one night... she was initiated into the Cabal a short while ago.. they take the parasite in the eye and then go on a wild high for a bit. I firmly believe she will be a patsy for their wrong doings.
The Vice President is the tiebreaker. If Kamala Harris becomes POTUS, she would select a new VP, who would probably be a Democrat, or at the very least, vote Democrat in tiebreakers. So no, not unless Harris decided to select a brand-loyalty Republican as her VP for some reason.
She can select ANYONE?
As long as the individual is Constitutionally qualified to be President, yes. Then a majority vote by both the House and the Senate.
It's laid out clearly by the 25th Amendment.
ok thanks
Read the article, and am not really sure how they seem so certain that Democrats are worried about a 50/50 tie failing in the VP nomination under Kamala Harris. Continuity of government isn't something that the legislature likes to fuck around with, and nominations usually don't get that much fight, even if the nomination hearings are loud and obnoxious.
Plus, Nancy Pelosi would still be the next in line if Harris were to stop being POTUS anyway.
Not sure that basing a theory on Mitch McConnell being able to indefinitely hold back the entire Republican party indefinitely from clearing a VP nomination holds much water.