posted ago by nimblepede ago by nimblepede +3 / -0

My buddy recommended a podcast called “Imposters: The Spy” which is a tale of a “fake” CIA agent. Doesn’t matter if he’s lying or not, but it’s full of bullshit talking points all revolving around muh Fox News and they trash anyone associated with Trump. They try to make general Mcinernery sound ridiculous in the first episode. On episode three they use “the attorney who represented the whistleblower in Trump’s first impeachment trial” as a star witness and really build up his credentials and then say that Vindman was the whistleblower. Totally bullshit cause EC was the whistleblower, what is the evidence against Vindman being the whistleblower again? I can’t find it anywhere and can’t remember.

Thanks in advance