There is one other possibility besides prediction. At any rate, the sheer number of these little "coincidences" lends to the credibility of Q being what Q is said to be.
What would count as proof/evidence for you? Lay down your criteria, this way you can’t keep moving the goalpost every time someone presents a strong case.
He doesn't actually want proof. If he did, he wouldn't be scoffing and pushing aside all purported evidence.
He's like a blind lemming who claims there is no evidence of voter fraud but won't look at or watch any videos demonstrating the evidence of voter fraud.
There is no rock solid proof becuase what the Q Team was doing was ostensibly illegal, so they had to leave room for plausible deniability, while still engaging a bunch of anonymous internet users who often don't trust anyone. How Trump got this bunch to trust him implicitly is to me, one of the big stories here and a lesson in politics that should be learned by all future students. (That answer in short is sincerity in leading people to freedom.) I bring up the quantity because a coincidence is going to be a rare occurrence. If we are to explain Q in terms of coincidences, I think that is less believable than speculating that there is something actually going on.
I give this theory credence because the anons who do have been right about many things, whereas the traditional media have been wrong, and taken as a whole, Q theory better explains current events as well as historical events than do traditional right v left explanations, and it really isn't all that far fetched to postulate that there are some with access to top intelligence and the skill sets to combat a relatively small group of people trying to take over the world.
There is one other possibility besides prediction. At any rate, the sheer number of these little "coincidences" lends to the credibility of Q being what Q is said to be.
What would count as proof/evidence for you? Lay down your criteria, this way you can’t keep moving the goalpost every time someone presents a strong case.
He doesn't actually want proof. If he did, he wouldn't be scoffing and pushing aside all purported evidence.
He's like a blind lemming who claims there is no evidence of voter fraud but won't look at or watch any videos demonstrating the evidence of voter fraud.
That’s the lamest attempt I’ve ever seen at laying down criteria for proof.
Transparentpill is a low level Chinese bot
There is no rock solid proof becuase what the Q Team was doing was ostensibly illegal, so they had to leave room for plausible deniability, while still engaging a bunch of anonymous internet users who often don't trust anyone. How Trump got this bunch to trust him implicitly is to me, one of the big stories here and a lesson in politics that should be learned by all future students. (That answer in short is sincerity in leading people to freedom.) I bring up the quantity because a coincidence is going to be a rare occurrence. If we are to explain Q in terms of coincidences, I think that is less believable than speculating that there is something actually going on.
I give this theory credence because the anons who do have been right about many things, whereas the traditional media have been wrong, and taken as a whole, Q theory better explains current events as well as historical events than do traditional right v left explanations, and it really isn't all that far fetched to postulate that there are some with access to top intelligence and the skill sets to combat a relatively small group of people trying to take over the world.