This is a reply in another thread by another anon and my reply to it.
the original comment:
EmotionallyDrained 1 point 1 hour ago +1 / -0 If your country is at war, and there is no way you can stop all suffering and death but you can save most by sacrificing a "few," would you do it? Could you make that hard choice? Pray for him and all of us.
my reply:
NewbieQbie 1 point moments ago +1 / -0 he basically said as much. He was talking about which state to allow to house the Space Force headquarters and said it was tough choosing, but it had to be done. Then told the crowd something along the lines of "Do you think you could make the decision if you had to? Do you know how tough these things are?" If choosing where to put a military headquarters is tough, IMAGINE choosing to endorse or not endorse a vaccine you needed to facilitate to prevent permanent lockdown of society???
just realized I forgot to include my conclusion: If the theory is correct that he HAD to release an experimental vax to prevent permanent lockdown, then endorsing or not endorsing it now are both extremely risky. If he doesn't endorse it, he turns all the focus of MSM on his admonition of the vax, and allowing for further mandates and lockdowns, and he makes his self look like a fool for allowing Operation Warp Speed continue in the first place. Look at what they did to him for HCQ. And if he endorses it, he could potentially be harming members of society, who are being harmed by the COVID situation in the first place. Every time he mentioned his good relations with China and how he put tariffs on them he always added in "...but then pandemic happened" almost to tell us that it was indeed a bioweapon.
Perhaps I didn't word my post correctly. It isn't about people making fun of him. He mentioned HCQ as a possible treatment for covid and they went wild banning any mention of it anywhere. He has even said "if I said the opposite, they wouldn't have banned it"
Now with the vax things seem to be working in reverse, at the beginning, everyone on the left was saying how they would never get it if Trump endorsed it. Now they are literally trying to mandate it. He literally can't win either way. But if he comes against it, every news segment/article will be about how Trump disapproves of his own vaccine. Imagine that headline everywhere. That takes the focus off of fighting for freedom of choice, and puts it directly on how stupid Trump is while also allowing them to force mandates even more. Sorry if I'm not wording my sentences properly, I'm running on 3 hours of sleep.
Stop arguing with obvious shills. Your analysis is very close to spot on.
Thanks for the encouragement.