I like Clif and appreciate his insights. However, he's made several statements about what is or what will be that seem to be based only on what he thinks (not from the predictive language), often vehemently said. The more vehemently and the more often he says them, the more I consider that in these cases he may not know what he's talking about. I don't remember how vehement he was about this one, and I'm just making a general observation.