2 Things Mainstream Media Didn’t Tell You About FDA’s Approval of Pfizer Vaccine
(childrenshealthdefense.org)
Comments (8)
sorted by:
FTA
IMHO - they've set up one of their strawmen...... either accept the unapproved that we know is dangerous or accept the supposedly just the same approved in Europe version that we know NOTHING about.
My god, it really is coming down to a deadly game of us vs. them. Our government has detached themselves from their own people.
The FDA is funded mostly by the pharmaceutical companies themselves -- a bit of a conflict of interest, wouldn't you say?
"For the first 86 years of FDA's existence, from 1906-1992, all of FDA's funding came through the U.S. Treasury. In other words, everyone -- industry, people -- paid their taxes, and FDA got appropriations out of the budget.
Starting in 1992, unfortunately, a law was passed that said for a large proportion of the work done by the FDA on new drug applications, the money's going to come directly, quid pro quo, from the industry. If they want a drug reviewed, they pay directly to the FDA to have the drug reviewed."
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/prescription/hazard/independent.html
We are not their people. Tjeybare supposed to be ours.
It really doesnt matter if approved or not, it still kills. FDA lost all credibility in this ambiguous report.
Dr. Robert Malone's website also has an excellent breakdown of the FDA approval decision, and he emphasizes the loss of indemnification as the motive.
https://files.catbox.moe/a4dwq8.pdf
His website:
https://www.rwmalonemd.com/news
BioNtech is poison and Comerity is the good one. Be sure to check the label, and ignore the fact that they are identical.
so what prevents them from relabeling the product?